A testament to your dishonesty is that you "forgot" to copy this part:
Mr. BELIN. I'm going to hand you what has been marked as Virginia Davis Deposition, Exhibit 2, and ask you to state if this is your signature on here?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. BELIN. Would you read the contents of your deposition Exhibit 2, and I will ask you if there is anything there that is inaccurate. (Reads statement.)
Mr. BELIN. You have read Exhibit 2?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes, sir.
Mr. BELIN. Is there anything in that statement that is inaccurate in any way?
Mrs. DAVIS. No, sir.
Mr. BELIN. Is that what you told the police of Dallas on November 22, 1963?
Mrs. DAVIS. That's right.
The Patton door was Virginia's front door so it doesn't make "Patton" go away. Too bad Virginia was such a bad liar but being able to fool you shows how bad your skill set is and nicely explains why you constantly find yourself cornered and having hissy fits.
Should we have a look at when her sister in law called the police or do you need a break?
A testament to your dishonesty is that you "forgot" to copy this part:
Ahhh poor little Otto made a Noob mistake and forgot to read the ENTIRETY of the Davis Testimony and had his quote all ready to go for his "gotcha" moment until I spoiled his little party with my superior testimony passage where Mrs Davis goes on to CLARIFY exactly what was supposed to be written.
Mr. BELIN. You say, "The man that was unloading the gun was the same man that I saw tonight as No. 2 man in a lineup." Is that right?
Mrs. DAVIS. Yes.
Mr. BELIN. Now, Mrs. Davis, on this statement, Virginia Davis Deposition Exhibit 2, it states that "We heard a shot and then another shot and ran to side door at Patton Street." You say that should have been the front door?
Mrs. DAVIS. That was supposed to be the front door.And as I pointed out, it's absolutely absurd to believe that Mrs Davis could see the yard from the Patton Street door, she describes in her affidavit events happening in the front yard, events corroborated by other eyewitnesses.
Too bad Virginia was such a bad liar but being able to fool you shows how bad your skill set is and nicely explains why you constantly find yourself cornered and having hissy fits.
Wow, twisted analysis totally devoid of logic, so Mrs Davis is "a bad liar" because in her affidavit the door is wrong and even though in her testimony she straightens it all out, you still persist with your worthless accusation. But why would a lady who just happened to live near a murder want to make up evidence, where does that go, do you have any proof that she was paid or an agent or even an informant? Anything?
Btw if there was any collusion and a possible conspiracy, or whatever paranoid delusion you're having today, with the Davis girls then surely wouldn't they have all the important details be exactly the same, the fact that there is so many consistencies in their stories but with small expected discrepancies speaks highly of their authenticity.
The problem for you Otto is you haven't been doing this very long at all and from my observations it's obvious you haven't studied any other case in any depth, so my advice is to get out more and try to understand people and what motivates them and start applying this new found knowledge to the JFKA and hopefully your eyes will open.
Because let's be frank here, your current methodology of producing mindless "gotcha" moments from explainable discrepancies is wearing thin and kinda shows that you don't want to solve this case but just want to Troll! Right?
Should we have a look at when her sister in law called the police or do you need a break?
As I explained above small expected discrepancies, lead AWAY from conspiracy, not towards it! DOH!
JohnM