The first day affidavit's are very similar, are you suggesting that they couldn't get their stories straight?Btw both women Positively Identified Lee Harvey Oswald as the man they saw!
In '63, Whaley described what his infamous passenger was wearing and he made no mention of any jacket. He even described, in detail, Oswald's shirt.Take it or leave it, them's the facts.Who knows why Whaley described one thing in '63 and then something different in his testimony in '64, but at least now you'll hopefully stop stating as a fact that Oswald was wearing two jackets in the cab.Lose your pissy attitude and read the FBI reports.
Does characterizing the jacket found as white preclude it from being the one placed in evidence or not? Walt has suggested that because the jacket was described as "white" it cannot be the same one in evidence, Do you agree or not? In my opinion, that jacket could be reasonably described as white, gray, or even tan depending on the light or shade.
Btw if there was any collusion and a possible conspiracy, or whatever paranoid delusion you're having today, with the Davis girls then surely wouldn't they have all the important details be exactly the same, the fact that there is so many consistencies in their stories but with small expected discrepancies speaks highly of their authenticity.
Saint Lee of the Oswalds.
I have no first hand knowledge of what they showed her. They showed the blue jacket to Benavides. Why?
The Whaley issue is really odd and goes nowhere, if Oswald used public transport to get the the rooming house that has absolutely no bearing on his guilt and the only real viable alternative is that Oswald had a getaway car which has a huge impact on his guilt.
And the Davis girls just happened to live a couple of doors down from a random killing but somehow they became involved within hours and they both had to quickly make up some story and because poor Virginia made a simple "typo" she is accused of being the spawn of Satan!
FBI reports are secondhand information.
