Lame LN excuses

[Bill Brown]

Is that really necessary?

No, but Whaley did. Nobody claimed you did.

How do you know what Whaley “wouldn’t have done”?

No, but Whaley did. Nobody claimed you did.

Otto Beck's dumb ass implied that I said it.

[Vincent Baxter]

Is this Tag Team debating today?
I reply to Otto and Weidmann replies
I reply to Weidmann and Otto replies
I again reply to Otto and Weidmann replies?

JohnM

  Yes, a very familiar occurrence, and I did used to find it very odd that Otto always randomly jumped in to defend Weidmann.
After a strange post one day where one of them accused me of implying something about them that I'd actually implied about the other, I came to the conclusion that Weidmann & Otto are actually the same person. Weidmann having created the Otto Beck account to back up his claims and help fight his corner.
Now I just have a good chuckle to myself whenever I see the Otto/Weidmann combination in full swing.

[John Mytton]

Yes, a very familiar occurrence, and I did used to find it very odd that Otto always randomly jumped in to defend Weidmann.
After a strange post one day where one of them accused me of implying something about them that I'd actually implied about the other, I came to the conclusion that Weidmann & Otto are actually the same person. Weidmann having created the Otto Black account to back up his claims and help fight his corner.
Now I just have a good chuckle to myself whenever I see the Otto/Weidmann combination in full swing.

Hi Vincent, you probably don't know but a few years back Bill Brown and I independently came to the same conclusion that Roger Collins invented a new alias Martin Weidmann to do as you say above, and funnily enough Roger Collins disappeared soon after. And it's clear that after Roger was thoroughly humiliated, he thought to himself I'll show em' and he never stopped inventing aliases.
But it doesn't take long for the aliases to expose themselves.

Richard recently made me laugh, he replied to Mongo about Bill's debate, but it's not in the thread anymore because Mongo's posts have all been taken off line, Yay!

Maybe Bill would take on yourself(....), Otto, Roger Collins, and Martin in one debate.  I bet it would even be easy to get all of you together in one place.
Richard Smith

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

Yes, a very familiar occurrence, and I did used to find it very odd that Otto always randomly jumped in to defend Weidmann.
After a strange post one day where one of them accused me of implying something about them that I'd actually implied about the other, I came to the conclusion that Weidmann & Otto are actually the same person. Weidmann having created the Otto Black account to back up his claims and help fight his corner.
Now I just have a good chuckle to myself whenever I see the Otto/Weidmann combination in full swing.

I'd put Weidmann/Iacoletti (of 'Dancing Monkeys' fame) right up there in the 'get a room, already' department

[John Mytton]

Now comes the difficult part where Nutters always fail: Providing the evidence to support their claim.

Hahahaha!

And that's exactly what Roger Collins said when we busted him, you can't make this up! Comedy Gold!

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

Hi Vincent, you probably don't know but a few years back Bill and I independently came to the same conclusion that Roger Collins invented a new alias Martin Weidmann to do as you say above, and funnily enough Roger Collins disappeared soon after. And it's that clear after Roger was thoroughly humiliated, he thought to himself I'll show em' and he never stopped inventing aliases.
But it doesn't take long for the aliases to expose themselves.

Richard recently made me laugh, he replied to Mongo about Bill's debate, but it's not in the thread anymore because Mongo's posts have all been taken off line, Yay!

Maybe Bill would take on yourself(....), Otto, Roger Collins, and Martin in one debate.  I bet it would even be easy to get all of you together in one place.
Richard Smith

JohnM

Don't miss the Roger the Dodger vs Bill 'Bonecrusher' Brown debate coming to a forum near you

[Vincent Baxter]

Hi Vincent, you probably don't know but a few years back Bill and I independently came to the same conclusion that Roger Collins invented a new alias Martin Weidmann to do as you say above, and funnily enough Roger Collins disappeared soon after. And it's clear that after Roger was thoroughly humiliated, he thought to himself I'll show em' and he never stopped inventing aliases.
But it doesn't take long for the aliases to expose themselves.

Richard recently made me laugh, he replied to Mongo about Bill's debate, but it's not in the thread anymore because Mongo's posts have all been taken off line, Yay!

Maybe Bill would take on yourself(....), Otto, Roger Collins, and Martin in one debate.  I bet it would even be easy to get all of you together in one place.

Richard Smith

JohnM

 
It's bizarre to think what lengths some people will go to attempt to win an argument on a forum.

I've been offline for a while. What happened with Mongo and his disappearance?

[Vincent Baxter]

I came to the conclusion that Weidmann & Otto are actually the same person.

But if they were, how come Otto "always randomly jumped in"?

Not quite sure I get the point you're trying to make here. Can you explain?

Now comes the difficult part where Nutters always fail: Providing the evidence to support their claim.

It's not a court of law, Weidmann/Beck. I don't have to provide supporting evidence.
You simply aroused suspicion by posting a reply attacking me for accusing you of something that I'd actually accused the other one of doing, which clearly suggested to me that you made an error in not realising which account you were logged into when you hit the submit button.

The fact that other people independently suspect this is that case too just makes anything you post laughable to me