What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

[Steve Howsley]

When forming a plan to commit a major crime it makes sense to limit the number of people required. That number could range from two individuals to dozens if not hundreds of people. The more people involved the greater the risk that loose lips could see the plan either fail in the lead up or fail in the execution. Even if the plan is successful there's a risk that those involved will be exposed in the subsequent investigation or through loose lips or a conspirator coming forward with evidence of their involvement and naming names.

An unwitting participant (someone who had a small but important part to play) could come forward once they realise that without their actions the crime could not have been carried out.

If you do have a preferred conspiracy it would be interesting to hear how many people (minimum) would be required either directly and/or indirectly in the execution and aftermath.

What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

[Mitch Todd]

When forming a plan to commit a major crime it makes sense to limit the number of people required. That number could range from two individuals to dozens if not hundreds of people. The more people involved the greater the risk that loose lips could see the plan either fail in the lead up or fail in the execution. Even if the plan is successful there's a risk that those involved will be exposed in the subsequent investigation or through loose lips or a conspirator coming forward with evidence of their involvement and naming names.

An unwitting participant (someone who had a small but important part to play) could come forward once they realise that without their actions the crime could not have been carried out.

If you do have a preferred conspiracy it would be interesting to hear how many people (minimum) would be required either directly and/or indirectly in the execution and aftermath.

What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

Two 

[Steve Howsley]

Two 

If that's to be taken seriously then what role did they play? If both were shooters then you discount any altering of medical evidence/wounds etc? If you believe there was medical tampering then you must think there was a shooter and a bent surgeon. Is that it?

[Richard Rubio]

If that's to be taken seriously then what role did they play? If both were shooters then you discount any altering of medical evidence/wounds etc? If you believe there was medical tampering then you must think there was a shooter and a bent surgeon. Is that it?

He's not a Conspiracy Theorist from what I understand, maybe he's saying, it takes 2 at a minimum for any conspiracy to work.  Obviously.

[Steve Howsley]

He's not a Conspiracy Theorist, maybe he's saying, it takes 2 at a minimum for any conspiracy to work.  Obviously.

Yes, I've now had to look at a couple of Mitch's posts to see what he's been saying on other issues. Often a single word response to a question comes over as ambiguous or negative. His point that it takes two minimum to make a conspiracy is certainly a truism.

[John Mytton]

When forming a plan to commit a major crime it makes sense to limit the number of people required. That number could range from two individuals to dozens if not hundreds of people. The more people involved the greater the risk that loose lips could see the plan either fail in the lead up or fail in the execution. Even if the plan is successful there's a risk that those involved will be exposed in the subsequent investigation or through loose lips or a conspirator coming forward with evidence of their involvement and naming names.

An unwitting participant (someone who had a small but important part to play) could come forward once they realise that without their actions the crime could not have been carried out.

If you do have a preferred conspiracy it would be interesting to hear how many people (minimum) would be required either directly and/or indirectly in the execution and aftermath.

What?s the MINIMUM number of people required for your CT to work?

Based on the typical responses of any number of CT's at a least a Hundred, but ask any of these same CT's how big the Conspiracy was and they will always say it was only a small conspiracy! Go figure?
Caprio, Weidmann and Iacoletti are classic examples of this Tardis like logic.



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Based on the typical responses of any number of CT's at a least a Hundred, but ask any of these same CT's how big the Conspiracy was and they will always say it was only a small conspiracy! Go figure?
Caprio, Weidmann and Iacoletti are classic examples of this Tardis like logic.

JohnM

Another Mytton like lie.

I have never claimed to know how many people were involved in a conspiracy if there has been one and Mytton can't prove otherwise.

[John Mytton]

Another Mytton like lie.

I have never claimed to know how many people were involved in a conspiracy if there has been one and Mytton can't prove otherwise.

Roger roger, no worries!



JohnM