?Motorcade Cop Tells How It Happened,? Sunday News (New York), 24 November 1963
p.25:
Dallas, Nov. 23 (Special) - B. W. Hargis, 31, Dallas motorcycle patrolman who was riding
in President Kennedy?s motorcade, gave this account today of the assassination:
?....
The President then looked like he was bent over or that he was leaning toward the Governor, talking to him.
As the President straightened back up, Mrs. Kennedy turned toward him, and that was when he got hit in the side of his head, spinning it around.
...
I was splattered with blood.
Then I felt something hit me. It could have been concrete or something, but I thought at first I might have been hit.
Then I saw the limousine stop, and I parked my motorcycle at the side of the road, got off and drew my gun.
Then this Secret Service agent (in the President?s car) got his wits about him and they took off. The
motorcycle officer on the RIGHT side of the car was Jim Chaney. He immediately went forward and announced to the chief that the President had been shot.?
If everyone agrees that the TSBD was downwind of the assassination, you can smell smoke if shots came from a revolver close by or at the front of car to be more precise! Right or Left. If you believe his perspective, it would be a more difficult observation than Chaney's. What his story!
We can now debate also whether this policeman was on JFK's side or Jackie's side. I would say he was on JFK's side as if you would follow his testimony as he gave it. His perspective would be from the right rear side of the limousine since you were following it with your motorcycle and it would make more sense. Was this Hagis possibly. We did see some other footage of a motorcycle cop coming off his bike on the other side of the road! In fact, the cars following the limousine pull over to where the assassin rolled into the grass. There were lots of people fleeing the scene in that footage as well, getting into cars and speeding off before the crowds came!
This policeman's account backs up my hypothesis. He said the President straightened backed up before he was shot. That coincides rather nicely with frontal bullet coming in through the windshield at z-322 and z-329. Curiously, these frames and z-331 don't find there way here.
https://www.jfkassassinationgallery.com/displayimage.php?album=6&pos=66They are conveniently not there in the analysis! You have to look at Costella frames or Lightbox Zapruder frames to see them.
You can clearly see the President raise his arm and move back in his seat after z-313 and z-314.
Remember, those drawn in shots were necessary to support the lone gunman theory and a shot from behind. To me, they never existed as Jacqueline does not react until the "real" head shot at z-329 and the red paint spot again drawn in at z-331, this time not as big! I could only imagine a very different reaction from her coinciding with a "plume of brain matter and blood" spraying 6 feet in the air at z-313. She has no reaction for more than a second from that and continued to look right at JFK for the next series of frames - no sign of immediate horror! Obviously didn't see anything until later.
So, yes being that all other vehicles are downwind, a close pistol shot from the front bumper of the limo will send the smoke from those two shots downwind in the direction of the TSBD. I would suspect all passing through would smell it. Two revolver shots in 1/2 a second from same spot sure would concentrate the odor.
I believe too, based on the initial account of Jean Hill before she talked to the FBI, that she heard 2 shots ring out when the President grabbed his neck. Again, best shot is from the umbrella man located "in front of sign" out of view of Zapruder's filming of the event.
Who ran the diversion? It was well coordinated and likely a "distractive" noise just slightly before actual neck shot and causing crowd to look in that direction! Need some proof?
Two guys are peeking over the background wall with their heads visible. What are they hiding from? Why not just stand there and watch? What secret are they taking part of? Look through the Costella slides. These are the best frames showing this.
Their heads disappear below and THEN out comes a "red cone" placed on the wall. This is not a red dress folks just so happens to be coincidental with the neck shot!
Pretty simple analysis in my view. You want a sure shot that doesn't kill or hurt anyone other than the President. No one else involved in the plot wants to die. The more direct and closer the shots can come, the more accurate it is. If I were part of the plot, I certainly wouldn't want trust a sniper taking pot shots at someone in the car if I was riding in the car and knowing what is going on! That neck shot was not a high powered rifle shot. You also have to contend with someone using an umbrella on this day (front of sign) and the so called "Cuban"next to him waving his arms at the President and Connally, begging "look at me!!" These two anomalies were present and unusual. Who else was out that day with umbrellas open and standing next to him vertically motioning at JFK and Connally with his arm fully stretched upwards! He wasn't clapping but trying to obtain JFK's attention!
There is a 35 mm slide coming from Phil Willis Copyright 1964.
Why copyright 3 years later than event and not brought forth immediately? It show a scene taken from the other side of the road. It show a VERY elevated road sign well above the umbrella man's level and everyone else. Compare that to the Zapruder film. This slide shows an umbrella man "behind" the sign (not in "front") and "below" not beside. I also can't see the "Cuban" waving his hand at the side either. This single frame was supposed to coincide with the neck shot!
That is very bizarre and reeks of misinformation! His one slide is given more credibility than the entire Zapruder filming introduced 3 years earlier!!
A lot more talent is required to edit a film and make it contiguous again - than a "single still frame" shot in my opinion! Remember the whole Zapruder Film was held for 12 years without allowing the public to see it? Why was that and who allowed that to happen and for what reason? The film was just too morbid I can only assume!