LOL
LOL
You know what's idiotic? Parroting "Oswald's rifle", "Oswald's window", "Oswald's shells", "Oswald's clip" over and over again like it proves anything.
Or thinking that stating a conclusion with confidence is somehow the same thing as evidence.
Right back at ya, do you think responding to every post repeatedly, ad nauseum with "LOL" for example "Oswald's rifle LOL" will make a mountain of supporting evidence just suddenly disappear, you must be joking.
Anyway time for a reality check, this endless quest of unearthing meaningless discrepancies that in their entirety just add up to a pile of stinking paranoia is simply not convincing, it's your job to prove to me that what you propose has a logical conclusion and goes somewhere because so far like every CT before you, you just keep throwing crap at the wall and hope something sticks but so far in 54 years all you have is no answers.
Btw you want to know why you keep getting your ass kicked, it's because your arguments are not based on reality, it only happened one way and that very specific path is supported by hundreds of witnesses and thousands of exhibits but for some reason you want to debate that practically everything is not as it seems and that just makes you look Kooky.
JohnM