As far as I know, Lamson never said he disagreed with Farid. He has told me he disagrees with 10˚, which was your figure and for which you have yet to provide a graphic justification.
Let's not forget that in 133A, Oswald's left side is closer to the camera than the right. This would contribute, I would think, some perspective distortion to an angle of tilt.
Farid's model (when shown more true-on) seems to show a 5˚ tilt.
The world's greatest photographer (IHOO) says that Oswald was leaning at a greater angle the Farid said, so by default he is disagreeing with Farid. Whether ia m correct or not is immaterial. A lone nutter has agreed that the so called expert, Farid, was wrong, which is what I have said all along.