Why would the conspirators let Oswald have a midnight press conference?

[John Mytton]

I don?t know what that is, but it certainly doesn?t prove anything.

 

OK!

JohnM

[Bill Brown]

OK!

JohnM

That's exactly the mantra Iacoletti adopts when discussing the overwhelming evidence against Oswald in the deaths of Kennedy and Tippit.

This is proof that one can put the evidence right in front of Iacoletti and he will still deny what it proves.  He is wrong on all accounts.

Perhaps he is going to claim that your image is doctored or faked, like he does about pretty much every single piece of evidence presented against Saint Lee of the Oswalds.

[John Mytton]

That's exactly the mantra Iacoletti adopts when discussing the overwhelming evidence against Oswald in the deaths of Kennedy and Tippit.

This is proof that one can put the evidence right in front of Iacoletti and he will still deny what it proves.  He is wrong on all accounts.

Perhaps he is going to claim that your image is doctored or faked, like he does about pretty much every single piece of evidence presented against Saint Lee of the Oswalds.

Precisely, that's why I didn't bother elaborating, Iacoletti was caught with his pants down and took up his familiar battle position, the sure sign of a man who has run out of ideas.

JohnM

[Richard Smith]

That's exactly the mantra Iacoletti adopts when discussing the overwhelming evidence against Oswald in the deaths of Kennedy and Tippit.

This is proof that one can put the evidence right in front of Iacoletti and he will still deny what it proves.  He is wrong on all accounts.

Perhaps he is going to claim that your image is doctored or faked, like he does about pretty much every single piece of evidence presented against Saint Lee of the Oswalds.

John I. is caught in another outright lie?  I'm shocked.  How slimy is it to knowingly make a false claim because he thought the thread had been deleted and no one could "prove" it?  How about Duncan clears it up by confirming that Martin participated in that thread and John can then apologize for his dishonesty? 

[John Iacoletti]

[Rob Caprio]

When Oswald's revolver and accompanying serial number was directly linked to Oswald's PO box then it's all over red rover.

JohnM

Prove it.

[Rob Caprio]

That's exactly the mantra Iacoletti adopts when discussing the overwhelming evidence against Oswald in the deaths of Kennedy and Tippit.

This is proof that one can put the evidence right in front of Iacoletti and he will still deny what it proves.  He is wrong on all accounts.

Perhaps he is going to claim that your image is doctored or faked, like he does about pretty much every single piece of evidence presented against Saint Lee of the Oswalds.

Boy, that is some pretty strong Koolade that you are drinking. You're totally delusional.

[Rob Caprio]

Precisely, that's why I didn't bother elaborating, Iacoletti was caught with his pants down and took up his familiar battle position, the sure sign of a man who has run out of ideas.

JohnM

How did you come by that screen shot?