You haven't shown that he could have, or would have been able to, For that matter, how would he have have been able to tell it was a .30-06?
I seem to recall trying to hold you to an explanation of how one could tell that a bullet was steel jacketed. You hemmed and hawwed and talked around an answer. I figure an even better question is, how do one tell a bullet is a .30-06 just from the (mangled) bullet alone. Your ensuing gyrations might be entertaining.
Then it shouldn't be too all that hard to to answer my question, now that you've studied it.
EAW said that CE 573 was NOT the bullet that he saw and held on the evening of April 10, 1963. I am not aware of him saying that it was a 30.06 bullet that he saw and held. I think that *you* invented that.
There is NO chain of custody for CE 573 and that is why you won't support the official claim.