Will we ever know what really happened?

[Dillon Rankine]

My money?s on option 2.

[Howard Gee]

We won't know every last detail. Some things are unknowable.

What we can say, based on the evidence, is that Saint Patsy murdered two people on 11/22/63 beyond any reasonable doubt.

There are those that will never be convinced that the accumulated evidence is genuine. In essence their position is; the evidence isn't real, therefore the case is unsolvable. It's safe to say they'll never know what happened.

Which is why the debate will go on forever.

[Jon Banks]

No.

We?ll never know what happened in the sense that people in general will agree on ?what happened?.

[Patrick Jackson]

No, because the truth would shatter America.

[Jerry Freeman]

I voted 'we already do'...It was a conspiratorial political assassination.
At least we had options besides yes and affirmative.

[Steve Howsley]

I voted 'we already do'...It was a conspiratorial political assassination.
At least we had options besides yes and affirmative.

If your position is that you already know it was a conspiracy you should be prepared to lay out your conspiracy with a reasonable level of detail including the names of participants and the role they played. Then you need to explain how it is that those details are still 'missing' from the public record despite 55 years of investigation.

[Nicholas Turner]

I selected that 'we already know' to mean that it was LHOo, who was not involved in any conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

[Jon Banks]

I selected that 'we already know' to mean that it was LHOo, who was not involved in any conspiracy to assassinate JFK.

Assuming you're right, will we ever know Why an admirer of JFK (according to many who knew LHO) turned against him?