Will we ever know what really happened?

[Dillon Rankine]

None that give insight as LHO was normal.

Despite all the studies showing that?s unlikely  .

Specially all those behavioural neurology papers I cited and you ignored. 

[John Iacoletti]

-an unrealistic expectancy of perfection in the evidence (in your world, people never make mistakes)

I think in your world, anything that doesn't comport with the official narrative is by definition a mistake.

[Dillon Rankine]

I think in your world, anything that doesn't comport with the official narrative is by definition a mistake.

No, I?m just not prepared to make mountains out of molehills because somebody got a date wrong, or had the audacity to not have a photographic memory.

[Paul May]

Studying Oswald?s history helps one understand this issue.  LHO may indeed have admired JFK as a person.  However, Oswald was not shooting at JFK, the person.  He was shooting at the POTUS and all that position represented in America and the world.

[Paul May]

Unanswerable question.  One of so many in the JFK event.

[John Iacoletti]

No, I?m just not prepared to make mountains out of molehills because somebody got a date wrong, or had the audacity to not have a photographic memory.

But you are prepared to make "mountains of evidence" out of molehills of assumption and conjecture.

[John Iacoletti]

Studying Oswald?s history helps one understand this issue.  LHO may indeed have admired JFK as a person.  However, Oswald was not shooting at JFK, the person.  He was shooting at the POTUS and all that position represented in America and the world.

What part of "Oswald's history" leads you to that conclusion?

[Dillon Rankine]

But you are prepared to make "mountains of evidence" out of molehills of assumption and conjecture.

What informs your view of my conduct in that way?