Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[John Iacoletti]

Mr. WESTBROOK. That is exactly the jacket we found.

Still haven't figured out who "we" is?

And how did Westbrook make the determination that this was exactly the jacket "we" found?

[Bill Brown]

LOL.  In unfair lineups.

Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?

[Bill Chapman]

Yes.  There's no baby in that filthy bathwater.

There's no proof of an alternate shooter in CTroll wonderland
There's no proof that anyone but the killer ( 'random guy' ) knew that an attempt was to be made on Kennedy that day

[Walt Cakebread]

Why was he living under an assumed name...

Spies are known to occasionally use an alias.....  Lee had been trained as a US intelligence agent ....

But your question is interesting....   When Fritz asked, Lee readily admitted that he was registered as O.H. Lee  at the rooming house.....   He told Fritz that Mrs Roberts made the error when he rented the room...

I don't know if that is true.....  So it raises an interesting question......

WHO was Lee hiding from?....   We know that FBI agent Hosty claimed that was looking for him...and Lee was aware that Hosty was looking for him.....BUT..... Hosty knew that he was working in the TSBD...and Lee tried to contact Hosty when he left the note at the FBI office......

Who was Lee trying to avoid?......

[John Iacoletti]

There's no proof of an alternate shooter in CTroll wonderland

...or your shooter for that matter.

There's no proof that anyone but the killer ( 'random guy' ) knew that an attempt was to be made on Kennedy that day

Who said otherwise?

[John Iacoletti]

Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?

They very well could have, since invalid lineups are invalid.  But since only one of them actually witnessed a crime, I'm not sure how it matters much who the other people saw.

[John Mytton]

Debatable.  But, even if true, is that somehow supposed to mean that Helen Markham, William Scoggins, Barbara Davis, Virginia Davis, Ted Callaway and Sam Guinyard actually saw someone other than Oswald?

Yep the chances that Markham would pick a particular random person out of four is obviously 1 in 4, then we have another 5 eyewitnesses who all had an equal chance of 1 in 4 of picking some random dude therefore when totalled means that for all the 6 eyewitnesses to choose the same random guy is close to astronomical!



JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Yep the chances that Markham would pick a particular random person out of four is obviously 1 in 4, then we have another 5 eyewitnesses who all had an equal chance of 1 in 4 of picking some random dude therefore when totalled means that for all the 6 eyewitnesses to choose the same random guy is close to astronomical!

JohnM

You need to watch a video, because you have just made the best case possible for why the line up identifications can not be trusted. The odds of this happening are indeed astronomical!

I'm sure John doesn't mind me borrowing the video.

Once you have done that, get back to us with some rational explanation, if you can.