Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 186737 times)

Offline John Iacoletti

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10882
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #488 on: February 10, 2018, 07:48:20 PM »
Advertisement
No bruises or gashes on any of these guys' eyes, either.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #488 on: February 10, 2018, 07:48:20 PM »


Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #489 on: February 11, 2018, 12:34:17 PM »
You only think so because your entire argument rests on that, since almost none of your "witnesses" actually witnessed a crime.


I rest my case.

But, to claim that these witnesses saw different men is dangerously close to taking up residence in Kookville.

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #490 on: February 11, 2018, 12:49:43 PM »
They picked the guy with the bruised face.

That was easy.

So none of the other guys had any bruises? cite?

JohnM

No bruises or gashes on any of these guys' eyes, either.



Exactly how long do you feel that a bruise should linger?

That photo you posted of the lineup participants was taken over five and a half months after the lineups.

I'm not arguing that any of the lineup participants actually had a bruise on their face, even though it can't be ruled out.  But, what does posting a photo of the participants taken almost six months later do to prove how these men looked on 11/22/63?  Please explain. 



« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 12:56:45 PM by Bill Brown »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #490 on: February 11, 2018, 12:49:43 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #491 on: February 11, 2018, 02:35:18 PM »
So now your number isn't close after all.

You're not bluffing, are you?


What on Earth are you blathering about?
Here is my original post.




Yep the chances that Markham would pick a particular random person out of four is obviously 1 in 4, then we have another 5 eyewitnesses who all had an equal chance of 1 in 4 of picking some random dude therefore when totalled means that for all the 6 eyewitnesses to choose the same random guy is close to astronomical!



JohnM



A small number < "close to astronomical" < astronomical.



JohnM

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #492 on: February 11, 2018, 02:46:22 PM »
« Last Edit: February 11, 2018, 03:02:25 PM by John Mytton »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #492 on: February 11, 2018, 02:46:22 PM »


Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #493 on: February 11, 2018, 02:52:17 PM »
I would expect them to have in a fair lineup.

Do you have photos of the lineups?




Quote
I would expect them to have in a fair lineup.

So you made a statement which you had no way of knowing is true, awesome!

Quote
Do you have photos of the lineups?

Unbelievable!



JohnM

Offline Bill Brown

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1845
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #494 on: February 11, 2018, 04:38:21 PM »
Hahahaha, when was the CE1054 taken?


JohnM

Mid-May of '64.

So, in an attempt to suggest evidence contamination (fibers found inside the bag being a match to the blanket fibers), we have Iacoletti posting a photo of the bag and blanket in contact with each other which was taken three days AFTER the bag was analyzed and the fibers were found inside the bag and studied by Stombaugh.

Now, we have Iacoletti posting a photo of Clark, Perry and Ables (the lineup participants along with Oswald) taken almost six months after the lineups were conducted in an attempt to show that these three men didn't have visible bruises on 11/22/63.

Nuts.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2018, 01:56:58 AM by Bill Brown »

Offline John Mytton

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #495 on: February 11, 2018, 11:50:15 PM »
Why a sudden need to introduce "a small number"?




No offence but since you didn't understand the concept the first couple of times I tried to dumb it down a little.



JohnM

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #495 on: February 11, 2018, 11:50:15 PM »