Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket

[John Iacoletti]

No.  You prove that Day was wrong about the date the photo was taken.

I didn't claim that Day was wrong.  I asked you how you know Day was right.  You have no answer.

The photo was posted in an attempt to supposedly show that there was evidence contamination.

No, the photo was posted to show that there could easily have been evidence contamination.

Straw man.

It's not a strawman.  How do fibers allegedly found in a bag show who shot somebody?

[John Iacoletti]

"Could have originated from this blanket".  There's some solid evidence for you! 

[John Iacoletti]

This is Bill Brown's thought process in a nutshell:

- Thinks it's significant that fibers in the bag could have come from the blanket in the garage

- Doesn't think it's significant that the bag could have been contaminated through improper evidence handling

[Walt Cakebread]

This is Bill Brown's thought process in a nutshell:

- Thinks it's significant that fibers in the bag could have come from the blanket in the garage

- Doesn't think it's significant that the bag could have been contaminated through improper evidence handling

I believe the fibers (plural) were ON the exterior surface of the bag....there was only a single fiber found inside the sack...

[John Iacoletti]

I believe the fibers (plural) were ON the exterior surface of the bag....there was only a single fiber found inside the sack...

Yes, but you never said why.

[Bill Brown]

I didn't claim that Day was wrong.  I asked you how you know Day was right.  You have no answer.

No, the photo was posted to show that there could easily have been evidence contamination.

It's not a strawman.  How do fibers allegedly found in a bag show who shot somebody?

I've already told you twice now why Day would know the date of that photo.  You ignore it, but it doesn't mean I haven't answered you.

If you can't prove that Day was wrong about the date of the photo then you're only grandstanding.  Typical.

The photo was taken three days after those items were examined by Stombaugh, so it (the photo) in no way shows that the evidence "could easily have been" contaminated before Stombaugh's analysis.

[Bill Brown]

This is Bill Brown's thought process in a nutshell:

- Thinks it's significant that fibers in the bag could have come from the blanket in the garage

- Doesn't think it's significant that the bag could have been contaminated through improper evidence handling

When you have to lie in an attempt to prove a point, you have no credibility.

I have never said that it is insignificant that the bag could have been contaminated.  I just haven't seen anyone post anything to show that it was. 

If you wish, I can run around here attributing false statements and beliefs about you, too.  Why do you want to play that game?  Don't you think it's a bit dishonest?

Don't misrepresent my position.

[Walt Cakebread]

Yes, but you never said why.

This photo explains ...WHY...  There were fibers that could have come from the blanket on the exterior surface of the paper sack.   



The sack is lying on the blanket.....