Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Oswald's Light-Colored Jacket  (Read 186241 times)

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5384
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #576 on: February 20, 2018, 03:29:54 PM »
Advertisement
"The photograph in question here was not taken on the night of 11/22/63."

Whether the photograph was taken on the 22nd or the 26th is Irrelevant.

The photo shows they were sloppy and used evidence handling techniques that would absolutely have

caused cross contamination between different items in their possession. In this case the homemade

TSBD wrapping paper gun case and the blanket from the Paine's garage that was allegedly used,

for at least several months, to wrap the TSBD Carcano. The disregard and lack of care shown in the photo

is proof the cross contamination could have taken place anytime the evidence was in their hands.

Since there were no fibers found on the TSBD rifle, the logical conclusion of how the fibers found on

homemade gun case got there is cross contamination. Arguing against that proposition is tantamount to

admitting evidence tampering.




Does this mean that you accept that the fibers came from Oswald's blanket?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #576 on: February 20, 2018, 03:29:54 PM »


Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #577 on: February 20, 2018, 04:15:25 PM »
The bag was tested by Stombaugh at 7:30 on 11/23 prior to Latona's application of iodine/silver nitrate later that day. Without knowing what time it is from the picture you can't possibly know if the bag has already been processed by Stombaugh. Why waste countless posts on things you don't know.

The bag was tested by Stombaugh at 7:30 on 11/23

The bag was received  by Stombaugh at 7:30 on 11/23

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #578 on: February 20, 2018, 05:32:20 PM »
Does this mean that you accept that the fibers came from Oswald's blanket?

"Does this mean that you accept that the fibers came from Oswald's blanket?"

They could have.

The point I was making was, since no fibers from that blanket were found on the TSBD Carcano the ones

found in/on the homemade gun case didn't/couldn't have come from that rifle. Where did the fibers come

from then? The logical conclusion, based on the photo of the blanket and gun case in contact while in LE

possession, is the fibers got on the gun case via cross contamination. If you argue against that proposition

you are left with evidence tampering.



« Last Edit: February 20, 2018, 05:50:55 PM by Gary Craig »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #578 on: February 20, 2018, 05:32:20 PM »


Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #579 on: February 21, 2018, 02:11:34 AM »
"Does this mean that you accept that the fibers came from Oswald's blanket?"

They could have.

The point I was making was, since no fibers from that blanket were found on the TSBD Carcano the ones

found in/on the homemade gun case didn't/couldn't have come from that rifle. Where did the fibers come

from then? The logical conclusion, based on the photo of the blanket and gun case in contact while in LE

possession, is the fibers got on the gun case via cross contamination. If you argue against that proposition

you are left with evidence tampering.





A logical possibility is fibres from the blanket were on the rifle which were then transferred from the rifle to the bag.
No blanket fibres left remaining on the rifle doesn't negate that possibility.
I'm not saying that is what happened I'm saying it is possible.

Offline Gary Craig

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 907
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #580 on: February 21, 2018, 04:49:55 PM »
A logical possibility is fibres from the blanket were on the rifle which were then transferred from the rifle to the bag.
No blanket fibres left remaining on the rifle doesn't negate that possibility.

I'm not saying that is what happened I'm saying it is possible.

"A logical possibility is fibres from the blanket were on the rifle which were then transferred from the rifle to the bag.
No blanket fibres left remaining on the rifle doesn't negate that possibility."











JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #580 on: February 21, 2018, 04:49:55 PM »


Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #581 on: February 21, 2018, 05:29:28 PM »
A logical possibility is fibres from the blanket were on the rifle which were then transferred from the rifle to the bag.
No blanket fibres left remaining on the rifle doesn't negate that possibility.
I'm not saying that is what happened I'm saying it is possible.

That is what happened. Any blanket fibers that had been on the rifle would have fallen off between the time that Oswald removed the rifle from the blanket and the time that Carl Day prepared it to be handed over to Vincent Drain.

Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #582 on: February 21, 2018, 08:34:17 PM »

That is what happened. Any blanket fibers that had been on the rifle would have fallen off between the time that Oswald removed the rifle from the blanket and the time that Carl Day prepared it to be handed over to Vincent Drain.


Wow, that's some factual statement, Tim

You will of course be able to back that up that claim with evidence to show that it is not just your opinion, right?

Offline John Anderson

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 136
Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #583 on: February 21, 2018, 10:30:54 PM »
That is what happened. Any blanket fibers that had been on the rifle would have fallen off between the time that Oswald removed the rifle from the blanket and the time that Carl Day prepared it to be handed over to Vincent Drain.

We can certainly take it as a possiblity and anyone claiming it's not a possiblity is plain wrong. Thisn't tough stuff to understand.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Oswald's Jacket
« Reply #583 on: February 21, 2018, 10:30:54 PM »