The Backyard Photos Have Insomnia

[John Mytton]

No, but the joke is how you still continue to lie about this.

What's the point?  You'll just declare that they are "clearly" not the same guy and pretend like the morph "speaks for itself".

No, but the joke is how you still continue to lie about this.

Yawn, you said what you said and I perfectly understand why you would want to deny it.

What's the point?  You'll just declare that they are "clearly" not the same guy and pretend like the morph "speaks for itself".

Just as I thought, you got nothing.

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Yawn, you said what you said and I perfectly understand why you would want to deny it.

Just as I thought, you got nothing.

You're not even a very good troll.

[John Mytton]

You're not even a very good troll.

You trolled me, Idiot!

JohnM

[Bernd Werner]

Every thread seems to wind up becoming another thread
So back to the back yard------
Notice which finger on which hand has a ring...

Okay, so what is your point? I really don't get it.

[John Mytton]

What's the point?  You'll just declare that they are "clearly" not the same guy and pretend like the morph "speaks for itself".

Here's a very close Oswald look alike but through the miracle of morphing we see immediately that they are clearly not the same person.



Btw I gave a challenge and there are millions of faces on the internet how about you find one and let's do it!

JohnM

[Jerry Freeman]

  ..there are literally millions of face photos on the internet, I challenge anyone to find a doppelganger for Oswald and let's put it to the above test and see if we can replicate identical results?

All that didn't explain the ring stuff did it? BTW ...challenge yourself [should keep you busy]
 

[John Iacoletti]

Here's a very close Oswald look alike but through the miracle of morphing we see immediately that they are clearly not the same person.

Just as I predicted you would do.

Mytton's shtick is to morph two photos with each other and then just declare "clearly they are the same person".  Then morph two other photos with each other and then just declare "clearly they are not the same person".  Then claim that his "clear" opinions of the results are "scientific".  Keep in mind that every intermediate step in the morph is a completely fabricated image.