Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: What the WC Actually Said  (Read 2907 times)

Offline Dillon Rankine

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
What the WC Actually Said
« on: January 28, 2019, 02:01:51 PM »
Advertisement
50+ and a the CTs still claim to have read the WCR despite obviously not doing so. How can asset this with such confidence, you might ask? Their total failure to accurately report on the its contents.

The WC actually never openly states the shot sequence, all they really say is:

  • Kennedy?s torso wounds came before the headshot
  • Connally?s wounds were probably inflicted by the same bullet
  • One shot missed


Despite over 2000 books saying so, the WC never actually states:

  • 5.6 second limit for the shooting?this is an inference based on assuming the first shot was at Z-210 (reached only on the basis of it being the first point st which Oswald could see JFK) and the last Z-313. The shorter 4.8 window is the WC assuming a Z-224 shot (JFK is already reacting so they finger the shot must have been fired between these it intervals). They never actually state which?s got missed, though ?reasoned? that Oswald probably couldn?t have missed the first one.
  • The SBT as necessary?though, TBF, it kind of is (or some variant of it at least). Weirdly, they claimed that determine which bullet hit JBC wasn?t necessary for their conclusions (another example of their ?reasoning? skills).
  • Which shot hit Tague?either the missed shot or a fragment from the headshot. It also isn?t true that Tague was a big problem for the WC as the FBI were already saying a fragment from the headshot caused his wound (saying the same thing about JFK?s throat wound).
  • Where the missed shot went?could?ve been best manhole cover or into the street. They ultimately never state where it went or what damage it caused. They also never state whether it was the first, second or third shot (though say probably the second because he wouldn?t fire after the headshot).

Just thought I?d bring some folks up to scratch.

JFK Assassination Forum

What the WC Actually Said
« on: January 28, 2019, 02:01:51 PM »


Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: What the WC Actually Said
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2019, 01:05:10 PM »
Richard Russell had a lot to do with the language adopted in your second point. The man was the least informed of the commissioners and believed in JBC's version that he had been hit by the second shot. IIRC, Russell wanted his dissent to the SBT placed in the final report and Alfred Goldberg was the one who came up with the final version in order to placate Russell.

Offline Royell Storing

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2769
Re: What the WC Actually Said
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2019, 03:07:38 PM »


   The SBT is right there with the Downward Angled LOW JFK Back wound somehow exiting at his throat. These alleged feats have Never been physically Duplicated. This renders both Conjecture =  BS:

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: What the WC Actually Said
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2019, 03:07:38 PM »