Typical LNer ploy. You made the claim, not me. The authorities acted as if the paraffin test was reliable at first. In fact, they called it the "conerstone" of their case.
They wouldn't have administered it if they thought that it was worthless as you claimed.
I don't use ploys in any area of my life.
You are the one failing to man-up
To wit: You said in November:
So again, why was it administered? And, why was the result of his hand test told to the media if it was useless?
I posted you the link (to the information as to why the tests were done although inadmissible as evidence)
2 months ago, and yet you stubbornly refuse to acknowledge it. Why is that?
Firearm Factoids_Paraffin Tests
http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/factoid2.htm