Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?  (Read 29086 times)

Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #56 on: September 18, 2018, 06:01:32 AM »
Advertisement
Yeah, Glee keeps calling him "Saint Patsy". Good of him to admit this.

I admit that even Zombie Saint Patsy could figure out what year Benavides died and that the forum's resident dunce can't.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #56 on: September 18, 2018, 06:01:32 AM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #57 on: September 18, 2018, 06:05:46 AM »
"They've taken me in because of the fact that I lived in the Soviet Union. I'm just a patsy!"
Lee Harvey Oswald


JohnM

'Patsy'

LOL. Dirty Harvey basically called himself 'weak and easily manipulated'

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #58 on: September 18, 2018, 12:11:12 PM »
No it can't be completely ruled out.

But after 55 years, no one has admitted to planting evidence, nor has anyone been able to prove that any evidence was planted.



There?s enough inconsistencies to say it?s ?Probable? that some evidence was tampered with.

Why would anyone voluntarily admit to tampering with evidence? How often do police agencies or prosecutors admit to things like that even after suspects get exonerated?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #58 on: September 18, 2018, 12:11:12 PM »


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #59 on: September 18, 2018, 02:21:59 PM »
There?s enough inconsistencies to say it?s ?Probable? that some evidence was tampered with.


What evidence was 'probably' tampered with and does the 'probable' tampering of whatever you come up with negate the totality of the evidence against Saint Patsy ?

But first let's hear what evidence you think was 'probably' tampered with.

Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #60 on: September 18, 2018, 03:21:44 PM »
What evidence was 'probably' tampered with and does the 'probable' tampering of whatever you come up with negate the totality of the evidence against Saint Patsy ?

But first let's hear what evidence you think was 'probably' tampered with.

Examples have been posted throughout this thread. 🙄

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #60 on: September 18, 2018, 03:21:44 PM »


Offline Howard Gee

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 343
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #61 on: September 18, 2018, 03:28:17 PM »
Examples have been posted throughout this thread.

What evidence do YOU think was probably tampered with ?


Offline Jon Banks

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1219
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #62 on: September 18, 2018, 04:14:28 PM »
What evidence do YOU think was probably tampered with ?

Repost since you don?t want to read the whole thread:

- The paper sack allegedly used to transport the rifle to TSBD
http://dealeyplazauk.org.uk/pdfArticles/The%20Paper%20bag%20that%20never%20was!.pdf

- The "Magic bullet" discovered at Parkland Hospital
https://history-matters.com/essays/frameup/EvenMoreMagical/EvenMoreMagical.htm

- The Palm Print that the FBI didn't find until after Oswald's death
http://www.garvandwane.com/conspiracy/oswalds_palm_prints.html

- Oswald's wallet with the incriminating Hiddell ID. Was it found at the Tippit murder scene or did he have it when he was arrested?
http://jfkfacts.org/oswalds-wallet-planted-at-the-tippit-crime-scene/

- The broken chain of evidence for the Shells found near the Tippit murder scene
http://jfkfacts.org/jerry-hills-lies-heart-tippit-shooting/

I'm sure there's more but those are a few of the most well known inconsistencies.

The closest anyone has come to admitting to planting (or staging) of evidence is the Wallet mystery. Ofc Croy says an unknown person handed him Oswald's wallet at the Tippit murder scene.

Offline Allan Fritzke

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 273
Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #63 on: September 18, 2018, 05:00:58 PM »
Did they ever do a forensic test on the  "magic bullet" to see if its markings matched the riflings in the Carcano and or the brass from which it originated from?  I would assume they likely did.   It still wouldn't mean anything.  That bullet was brought in via 5 different people in hand-offs after the crime scene was abandoned.  This is maybe why there was a mixture of different casings and bullet types used.    Anyone could take the Carcano in the evidence locker and shoot it into a pillow and gather up the round!     If you need to invent evidence, there is nothing better than slipping it in as required and giving it a nice long voyage from the stretcher to the crime lab, passing it through 5 different individuals and placing it in the evidence locker to match the outline of your story.

Its like having a December 18, 1963 letter gathered up to make sure that there was no hole in the windshield - a paper necessary to rebuttal those that actually witnessed a hole - that needed to be dismissed as well by introducing evidence gathered later to match the story narrative.  "Could you write something up for me, I need to ask you for a BIG favor......"
« Last Edit: September 18, 2018, 05:04:30 PM by Allan Fritzke »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?
« Reply #63 on: September 18, 2018, 05:00:58 PM »