In 54 years has anyone ever admitted to manufacturing or planting evidence?

[John Mytton]

Bugliosi finally got something right.  Pity that he couldn't meet his own burden of proof.

Bugliosi presents a mountain of evidence and you reply with a tiny list of self serving objections.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

Bugliosi presents a mountain of evidence and you reply with a tiny list of self serving objections.

JohnM

Johnny still doesn't understand that an appeal to authority (even one as flawed as this one) is nothing more than a well known fallacy 

[John Iacoletti]

Bugliosi presents a mountain of evidence and you reply with a tiny list of self serving objections.

A ring in a cup.  Coke, not Dr. Pepper.  Not chatty with a cab driver. Didn't read the newspaper that morning.  "prohibitive probability".

That's a mountain of rhetoric, not evidence.

 

[Martin Weidmann]

It seems John Mytton is completely unable to show that the bullet now in evidence as CE399 was ever at Parkland Hospital.

This of course makes any discussion about possible planted evidence obsolete and a complete waste of time. 

[Rob Caprio]

That wasn't the debate, can you prove CE399 was planted or not?

JohnM

The claim in 1964 was that CE 399 was found at PH. Now support that claim because the WC didn't.

[Rob Caprio]

This is particularly startling and noteworthy when one stops to realize that those making the allegation of conspiracy necessarily have the burden of proof. I mean, it makes no sense for A to say to B, ?I allege that there is a conspiracy here. Now you prove there isn?t.? The alleger always, by definition, has the burden of proof.
RHVB

JohnM

And yet, you can claim that LHO did it alone without supporting it in the least. That is some double standard you have there.