Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Richard Smith]

Why don't you show that every employee was hired in one day like LHO?

Because I never made that claim.  You made the claim that there was something strange about the failure of Truly to conduct a background check on Oswald.  I interpreted that to mean that you somehow knew that Oswald was treated differently than other employees.  That is apparently not the case.

[John Mytton]

I'm actually surprised that Bugliosi didn't include this in his list of "evidence".  "Mytton" however will carry on the banner of absurd arguments.

Oswald saw a movie about an assassination, therefore he killed JFK.

"Mytton"

Hahaha, talk about petty, of course my name isn't "Mytton" just like your name isn't "Iacoletti" and that photo of the bald guy as your alias is obviously a forgery but do carry on John!

JohnM

[John Iacoletti]

Hahaha, talk about petty, of course my name isn't "Mytton" just like your name isn't "Iacoletti" and that photo of the bald guy as your alias is obviously a forgery but do carry on John!

Well, one of those statements is actually true.  That's an accomplishment for you.

[John Mytton]

Well, one of those statements is actually true.  That's an accomplishment for you.

All of those statements are true.

JohnM

[Bill Chapman]

As if a wedding ring is a "piece of evidence in the case".

It initially speaks to Oswald's possible state-of-mind that morning. It could be seen as confined only to their relationship issues and nothing more. That much has already been acknowledged by most occupants of both camps.

[John Mytton]

Anyone know why Pinocchio John is putting my name in quotation marks?  I know he is dishonest, but paranoia appears to be new along with his bizarre avatar which seems to be an expression of self-contempt.

He's been doing it to my name for months and it is a little bizarre because I don't think anybody in this Forum actually uses their own name and if they did and also used a photo of themselves then imo you leave yourself wide open.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

As if a wedding ring is a "piece of evidence in the case".

You've been told before, the wedding ring is only one half of one piece of Bugliosi's evidence which amounts to less than 1% of Bugliosi's total case against Oswald.

JohnM

[Walt Cakebread]

He's been doing it to my name for months and it is a little bizarre because I don't think anybody in this Forum actually uses their own name and if they did and also used a photo of themselves then imo you leave yourself wide open.



JohnM

I don't think anybody in this Forum actually uses their own name and if they did and also used a photo of themselves then imo you leave yourself wide open.

This is a obvious admission that Mytton is dishonest and uses an alias.....

An honest person doesn't worry about "leaving himself wide open"   .....An honest man has little to hide...