Now that dishonest John has acknowledged his misleading omission and lies, let's get back on topic:
I haven't acknowledged anything of the kind. You can't even tell the truth about
that!
Does the use of a rifle instead of pistol lend itself to proof of Oswald's innocence as Caprio suggests? Yes or no.
If no, we are in agreement and don't have to engage in an endless compulsion driven trip down the rabbit hole making arguments like a disbarred defense attorney on behalf of a guilty client.
Is this supposed to be some sort of justification for telling lies like "Marina indicates he did take the MC rifle to practice"? What's so compulsive about pointing out your many falsehoods about the case? That's the difference between you and me. I actually cite your lies, not just make vague accusations I can't support.