Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Richard Smith]

Why is this so difficult to comprehend? I am  referring to a LONE shooter. You are making it about something else. NO lone gunman had ever used a rifle prior to November 22, 1963.

LOL.  You are trying to make the following point.  Because no lone gunman had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, then that somehow proves that Oswald did not.   The logical extension of that "logic" is that no conspirator had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, therefore no conspirator did so on 11.22.  What is so difficult to comprehend about this?  It is the application of your nutty logic.  What you are in effect claiming is that because no one had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, that JFK was not assassinated by anyone.

[John Iacoletti]

LOL.  You are trying to make the following point.  Because no lone gunman had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, then that somehow proves that Oswald did not.

That not nearly as nutty as a wedding ring in a cup somehow proving that Oswald did.

[Richard Smith]

Nice avatar.  Appropriate but Pinocchio would have been an even better choice.  Still refusing to answer the relevant question in this discussion while going on and on with your disbarred defense attorney nonsense.  Dishonest John. 

[John Iacoletti]

Nice avatar.  Appropriate but Pinocchio would have been an even better choice.

Says the guy who's still lying abut Oswald pulling a gun, but has yet to come up with a single example of me lying.

  Still refusing to answer the relevant question in this discussion while going on and on with your disbarred defense attorney nonsense.  Dishonest John.

And still being dishonest about what the word "dishonest" means.  Who appointed you the arbiter of relevant questions?  Your title is King of the Strawmen.

[Walt Cakebread]

Nice avatar.  Appropriate but Pinocchio would have been an even better choice.  Still refusing to answer the relevant question in this discussion while going on and on with your disbarred defense attorney nonsense.  Dishonest John.

Perhaps Mr Iacoletti is portraying himself as a horny devil.....

[John Iacoletti]

Perhaps Mr Iacoletti is portraying himself as a horny devil.....

That came from Jerry Organ, and it's awesome.

[Richard Smith]

Dishonest John still spinning.  Just answer the question.  Does the use of a rifle instead of a pistol lend itself to Oswald's innocence?  An honest person would just say yea or nay.  A dishonest person would go off on some wild tangent.

[John Mytton]

Mr. RANKIN. Do you recall films that he saw called "Suddenly," and "We were Strangers" that involved assassinations?
Mrs. OSWALD. I don't remember the names of these films. If you would remind me of the contents, perhaps I would know.
Mr. RANKIN. Well, "Suddenly," was about the assassination of a president, and the other was about the assassination of a Cuban dictator.
Mrs. OSWALD. Yes, Lee saw those films.
Mr. RANKIN. Did he tell you that he had seen them?
Mrs. OSWALD. I was with him when he watched them.



I just noticed that Jerry beat me to this reference and he also had more examples. Nice work Jerry.

JohnM