Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Rob Caprio]

Dishonest John can't answer such questions as they would necessitate some proof.  He is just a contrarian.  Everything is potentially faked but he is not implying anyone is responsible for all the fakery.  He has rambled on and on here but not answered the relevant question.  Does the use of a rifle rather than a pistol lend itself to Oswald's innocence as Caprio stupidly suggested?  I assume he agrees the answer is no but is too dishonest to answer.

It's not nice to call Mytton dishonest. True, but not nice. 🤣😅

[Walt Cakebread]

It's not nice to call Mytton dishonest. True, but not nice. 🤣😅

Huh??...   So you believe there is something wrong with being honest?    Do I have that right, Rob?

[Richard Smith]

Why is this so difficult to comprehend? I am  referring to a LONE shooter. You are making it about something else. NO lone gunman had ever used a rifle prior to November 22, 1963.

LOL.  You are trying to make the following point.  Because no lone gunman had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, then that somehow proves that Oswald did not.   The logical extension of that "logic" is that no conspirator had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, therefore no conspirator did so on 11.22.  What is so difficult to comprehend about this?  It is the application of your nutty logic.  What you are in effect claiming is that because no one had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, that JFK was not assassinated by anyone.

[John Iacoletti]

LOL.  You are trying to make the following point.  Because no lone gunman had used a rifle to assassinate a president prior to 11.22, then that somehow proves that Oswald did not.

That not nearly as nutty as a wedding ring in a cup somehow proving that Oswald did.

[Richard Smith]

Nice avatar.  Appropriate but Pinocchio would have been an even better choice.  Still refusing to answer the relevant question in this discussion while going on and on with your disbarred defense attorney nonsense.  Dishonest John. 

[John Iacoletti]

Nice avatar.  Appropriate but Pinocchio would have been an even better choice.

Says the guy who's still lying abut Oswald pulling a gun, but has yet to come up with a single example of me lying.

  Still refusing to answer the relevant question in this discussion while going on and on with your disbarred defense attorney nonsense.  Dishonest John.

And still being dishonest about what the word "dishonest" means.  Who appointed you the arbiter of relevant questions?  Your title is King of the Strawmen.

[Jerry Organ]

Why is this so difficult to comprehend? I am  referring to a LONE shooter. You are making it about something else. NO lone gunman had ever used a rifle prior to November 22, 1963.

Lincoln apparently was the target of an assassination attempt by rifle in August 1864 as he rode alone on his horse outside Washington.
The 1954 movie 'Suddenly" and the 1962 movie "The Manchurian Candidate" featured the sniper-rifle plot to eliminate a President and Presidential candidate respectively.

[Walt Cakebread]

Nice avatar.  Appropriate but Pinocchio would have been an even better choice.  Still refusing to answer the relevant question in this discussion while going on and on with your disbarred defense attorney nonsense.  Dishonest John.

Perhaps Mr Iacoletti is portraying himself as a horny devil.....