Why Would LHO Choose His Workplace As The Location For Shooting JFK?

[Bill Chapman]

Yes -- is there some relevance to the JFK assassination?

Actually it was "oh gawd, I hope not". 

Glad you enjoy my volunteer work, but your purpose in bring that up here is...what exactly?

Seems your 'gawd' is Richard Dawkins 

Your fervour for insisting on what, to reasonable people, is an over-the-top standard of proof here, is now more fully understood. That is the relevance to the assassination.

Thanks for sharing.

[John Iacoletti]

Seems your 'gawd' is Richard Dawkins 

Where in the world did you get that?  Oh yeah, you just made it up.  Big surprise.

Your fervour for insisting on what, to reasonable people, is an over-the-top standard of proof here is now more fully understood. That is the relevance to the assassination.

Thanks for sharing.

Just evidence, rather than unsupported claims.  That's all it takes.  If you had it, you wouldn't need to divert with "reasonable people" and "over-the-top" excuses.

[Bill Chapman]

Where in the world did you get that?  Oh yeah, you just made it up.  Big surprise.

Just evidence, rather than unsupported claims.  That's all it takes.  If you had it, you wouldn't need to divert with "reasonable people" and "over-the-top" excuses.

Those are not excuses. They are observations. From the SaneStream.

Proof, you say? Well, it's hard to imagine just how much evidence it would take to convince a determined buff of anything, anything at all.

Dawkins calls 'believers' stupid. You call LNers lemmings. Both designations reek of desperation to get people to agree to whatever the f*ck your agendas are.

[John Mytton]

Don't know who that is.

Wouldn't you like to know.

Hey, I also picked guys from your team Beta who at least have the guts to use their own names.

Btw how can you prove that Walt, Rob and Martin are using their real names

Wouldn't you like to know.

Oops, do you know something that Caprio doesn't know? LOL
Dishonest JohnI strikes again,

Hey, I also picked guys.....

Sure, we believe you, millions wouldn't but we do! Hehehe.

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Too bad your exhibit doesn't have "Hidell" on it anywhere.

JohnM

[Sean Kneringer]

Um, because he worked at the TSBD and not the Trade Mart? Because he knew the sixth floor was scarcely populated and afforded plenty of camouflage?

[John Iacoletti]

Those are not excuses. They are observations. From the SaneStream.

Everybody thinks his own opinions are the sane and rational ones.  That's not an argument that you are actually correct.

Proof, you say? Well, it's hard to imagine just how much evidence it would take to convince a determined buff of anything, anything at all.

Well, given that in all your banter you never actually discuss the evidence that convinces you that your opinion is true, it's hard to imagine why you think there needs to be too much of it, or even what you consider to be sufficient and why.

[John Iacoletti]

Oops, do you know something that Caprio doesn't know?

Quite possibly.

So you believe Caprio now.  Good to know.