Film footage comparison & film tampering...

[Ray Mitcham]

The drawings were not meant to show the size of the wounds to any kind of scale, nor were they meant to show the precise locations of the wounds.

The illustrations were only used a rough guide.

Precise noted measurements of the size and locations of the wounds were calculated.

Where are the top of the head wounds shown on the autopsy sheet, Duncan?

Strange that the sheet shows a small bullet hole in the shoulder but neglects, according to the autopsy photos, to mention a massive wound on the top of the head or the flap of wound apparently shown on the Zap film. 

[Michael Walton]

Are you addressing me. If so, then I already recognize that no CT thinks Oswald's shooting skills would be up to the task.

Again I ask, since Oswald was apparently a lousy shot, with a lousy weapon... would you seat yourself in JFK's position and let an Oswald-quality shooter fire at you, or not?

Yes, because I'm Michael Walton, a nobody, and they wanted JFK dead, not me. /s/

[Robin Unger]

Nix film DEGRADED ?

That would depend on which version you look at.

Regarding the so called limo stop, there was no limo stop, BUT the limo did "slow down to a crawl" immediately after the head shot
as Clint Hill lunged for the grab rail on the limo.

[Walt Cakebread]

Nix film DEGRADED ?

That would depend on which version you look at.

Regarding the so called limo stop, there was no limo stop, BUT the limo did "slow down to a crawl" immediately after the head shot
as Clint Hill lunged for the grab rail on the limo.

Where is officer Chaney when he first appears in the video?    He is alongside the rear fender of the Lincoln and falling back....( braking)    He apparently had been alongside the Lincoln prior to this instant.

[Robin Unger]

[Robin Unger]

Chaney was riding at "normal speed", then the head shot happened and  Greer immediately slowed the limo to a crawl
that is when Chaney momentarily caught up to the limo before applying the brakes.

Nix frames Credit: Gayle Nix Jackson

[Ray Mitcham]

I'm not going to repeat myself to deaf ears and blinkered eyes.
Look, Listen and Learn the facts.

Seems you are the one with deaf ears and blinkered eyes, not me. The autopsy sheet did not show any wound to the top of the head. The doctors at Parkland didn't see a wound to the top of the head.(How strange is that?) Only the photos of the autopsy (dubious at best) and Humes says that there was. And that was after the arrival of the body at Bethesda.

[Michael Walton]

Seems you are the one with deaf ears and blinkered eyes, not me. The autopsy sheet did not show any wound to the top of the head. The doctors at Parkland didn't see a wound to the top of the head.(How strange is that?) Only the photos of the autopsy (dubious at best) and Humes says that there was. And that was after the arrival of the body at Bethesda.

Ray - does it really matter? If you strongly believe, as I do, that there was a conspiracy, then the basic proof for that is the Zapruder film.  If you believe, as I and others do, that Oswald could not have pulled off the shooting feat that the WC says he did, then it's pretty much a done deal.  There *was* a conspiracy.  Period.

Quibbling over "where was the top of the head blowout" and all of the other stuff is ridiculous. Forget the kitchen sink mentality and move on knowing that there was a conspiracy - and there is no one on this Earth that can really do anything about it. The only thing that would change things is if there was a POTUS who came in and announced officially and for the record that "There was a conspiracy" and we all know that will never, ever happen. At least not in our lifetime.