How Could LHO Walk Seven Blocks Shortly After The Assassination & Not Be Seen?

[Rob Caprio]

Mr. McWATTERS - This is a schedule, I will just say a bus schedule.



JohnM

What does a bus schedule from June 4, 1962, have to do with November 22, 1963?

[Rob Caprio]

Watch the weasel squirm?.

how much of my post after "How does this work Caprio?, you say" can be attributed to Caprio, the first few words or all of it?


All of it between the two komma's and prior to you asking a question!


Desperate for a way out, Johnny is now trying to spin this thing by suggesting that only the first part (about the FBI and WC altering testimony, which is something Rob did indeed say) was a quote from him and the second part ("therefor the entire work is contaminated") somehow wasn't.

The problem for Johnny is that the question he asked clearly reveals that by "any of this tainted evidence" he means "the entire work" that is contaminated. So, not some of it, but all of it. This is beyond obvious because if only parts of the material of the FBI and WC were "contaminated" his question would make no sense.  In other words, he needed to attribute the quote (including "the entire contamined work" bit) to Rob Caprio to be able to ask the question!

Besides, if the bit about the "entire contaminated work" is not an (alleged) quote from Rob Caprio, as Johnny now claims, then where does it come from, who said it and why is it included in a question directed at Rob Caprio?

Now let?s watch the weasel squirm some more?.

He does this constantly and then has the gall to discuss other peoples' credibility.

[Rob Caprio]

OK, I understand, this might be bus schedule like summer and winter schedule or schedule that will be effective from 6-4-62 until new schedule approved. But still it does not have sense it is 62. No sense this evidence has anything to do with 11/22/63.

You're right Patrick. This shows the dishonesty needed to support the official theory. This tells us all we need to know about the validity of that theory. Good catch.

[Martin Weidmann]

He does this constantly and then has the gall to discuss other peoples' credibility.

Well, he seems to be running from this one, in much the same way as he ran from the discussion about CE399 ever being at Parkland Hospital.

No credibility whatsoever!

[John Mytton]

You try again as that doesn't say the FBI contaminated the whole case as you falsely attributed to me. You're digging your hole deeper.

Your quote says that the FBI altered evidence and if you truly believe that you have provided proof that they actually altered evidence then how could you possibly trust anything that was presented by the FBI therefore the entire case is contaminated and if this is not what you are trying to say then what possible incentive do you have for bringing up these tiny isolated anomalies in the first place??

Anyway look at it this way, if I find a single turd in my swimming pool then the entire pool is contaminated and needs to be emptied and disinfected but it appears that you would rather swim with your turd, fair enough!

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Watch the weasel squirm?.

how much of my post after "How does this work Caprio?, you say" can be attributed to Caprio, the first few words or all of it?


All of it between the two komma's and prior to you asking a question!


Desperate for a way out, Johnny is now trying to spin this thing by suggesting that only the first part (about the FBI and WC altering testimony, which is something Rob did indeed say) was a quote from him and the second part ("therefor the entire work is contaminated") somehow wasn't.

The problem for Johnny is that the question he asked clearly reveals that by "any of this tainted evidence" he means "the entire work" that is contaminated. So, not some of it, but all of it. This is beyond obvious because if only parts of the material of the FBI and WC were "contaminated" his question would make no sense.  In other words, he needed to attribute the quote (including "the entire contamined work" bit) to Rob Caprio to be able to ask the question!

Besides, if the bit about the "entire contaminated work" is not an (alleged) quote from Rob Caprio, as Johnny now claims, then where does it come from, who said it and why is it included in a question directed at Rob Caprio?

Now let?s watch the weasel squirm some more?.

All of it between the two komma's and prior to you asking a question!

You're literally reinventing grammar to cover your ass, hilarious!

JohnM

[John Mytton]

Mytton put forth evidence and misrepresented it once again. Nothing new there.

No worries Rob, how about you stick to your bizarre theories like Ruby firing blanks and Oswald's pubic hairs and let the big boys discuss what actually happened.

JohnM

[Martin Weidmann]

You're literally reinventing grammar to cover your ass, hilarious!

JohnM

Projection (Psychological)

1) An unconscious self-defence mechanism characterised by a person unconsciously attributing their own issues onto someone or something else as a form of delusion and denial.

2) A way to blame others for your own negative thoughts by repressing them and then attributing them to someone else. Due to the sorrowful nature of delusion and denial it is very difficult for the target to be able to clarify the reality of the situation.

3) A way to transfer guilt for your own thoughts, emotions and actions onto another as a way of not admitting your guilt to yourself.

https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Projection