Corroboration of Assassination films

[David Dickson]

Hi,

Sorry if his has been asked before.

Has anybody studied all of the assassination films and analysed whether they corroborate one another?

It should be possible using modern technology to have each person in each film fixed at a moment in time and space relative to one another and to fixed landmarks.

They could then be compared with each assassination film to check whether they still maintain the same fixed point in time and space.

Every bystander should be present in each of the films and in the same location, were that not to be the case it would clearly show where the films have been altered if indeed they have.

Cheers

[Steve Barber]

Hi,

Sorry if his has been asked before.

Has anybody studied all of the assassination films and analysed whether they corroborate one another?

It should be possible using modern technology to have each person in each film fixed at a moment in time and space relative to one another and to fixed landmarks.

They could then be compared with each assassination film to check whether they still maintain the same fixed point in time and space.

Every bystander should be present in each of the films and in the same location, were that not to be the case it would clearly show where the films have been altered if indeed they have.

Cheers

 Dale Myers has synchronized each film. 

[Chris Bristow]

The films have been scrutinized by many and they are consistent. There are claims that certain witness' show up in Z but not Nix. In every case I have seen the issue goes away when you take their line of sight into account. Another popular claim is that Jackie is farther back on the trunk in the Nix film but it can be explained too.

[W. Tracy Parnell]

Hi,

Sorry if his has been asked before.

Has anybody studied all of the assassination films and analysed whether they corroborate one another?

Yes they do and that pretty much rules out any films or photos being faked as part of a vast plot.

[Royell Storing]

The films have been scrutinized by many and they are consistent. There are claims that certain witness' show up in Z but not Nix. In every case I have seen the issue goes away when you take their line of sight into account. Another popular claim is that Jackie is farther back on the trunk in the Nix film but it can be explained too.

     There is Nothing consistent regarding the Current Zapruder Film and the Sudden appearance of the JFK Limo on Elm St.  At No time did Zapruder testify that he stopped and started his filming of the JFK Motorcade. In fact, Sitzman when interviewed by Tink Thompson for his groundbreaking "Six Seconds In Dallas",  revealed that their high ground position/the perch permitted them to see the JFK Limo coming down Houston St and then turning onto Elm St. 

[Jack Trojan]

Yes they do and that pretty much rules out any films or photos being faked as part of a vast plot.

Hardly. The Z film was definitely edited in several places, which has nothing to do with the synchronization of a few seconds of film from 2 sources.  Why did the FBI keep the original film, why haven't they pulled it out and proved that it was not faked as part of a vast plot, and where is the film now? It sure as hell isn't behind glass at the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza. That's a copy.

The FBI could have settled all this 55 years ago by returning the original film to Zapruder instead of a copy. The original film would tell all, which is why they hid it from us. The only reason to hide the original Z film and put a forgery in its place is to cover up the truth. The only logical conclusion one can reach is that the Z film was tampered with to remove all evidence of a conspiracy and to support the lone gunman narrative.

[Nicholas Turner]

Hardly. The Z film was definitely edited in several places, which has nothing to do with the synchronization of a few seconds of film from 2 sources.  Why did the FBI keep the original film, why haven't they pulled it out and proved that it was not faked as part of a vast plot, and where is the film now? It sure as hell isn't behind glass at the Sixth Floor Museum at Dealey Plaza. That's a copy.

The FBI could have settled all this 55 years ago by returning the original film to Zapruder instead of a copy. The original film would tell all, which is why they hid it from us. The only reason to hide the original Z film and put a forgery in its place is to cover up the truth. The only logical conclusion one can reach is that the Z film was tampered with to remove all evidence of a conspiracy and to support the lone gunman narrative.

Or you could conclude that the original is being preserved as an historic item, having been damaged in the past remember. Future technology may be able to restore and improve it to enable even more information to be found which would be lost if the original is damaged further or even destroyed.

[Royell Storing]

Or you could conclude that the original is being preserved as an historic item, having been damaged in the past remember. Future technology may be able to restore and improve it to enable even more information to be found which would be lost if the original is damaged further or even destroyed.

   "Future technology" is Exactly why the Z Film was Locked inside a Vault for its' initial 12 years of existence. Over the course of 54+ years the Z Film has had More "Nips-N-Tucks" than Jane Fonda has.