For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence

[Bill Brown]

I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity..

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

Would you mind listing the evidence in the case that you DO consider authentic?  Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

[Martin Weidmann]

I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity..

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

Would you mind listing the evidence in the case that you DO consider authentic?  Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

This might surprise you, but I think most of the evidence that we know is probably authentic. Whether it justifies the conclusions based upon it and the context in which it's being presented is another matter.

[Bill Brown]

This might surprise you, but I think most of the evidence that we know is probably authentic. Whether it justifies the conclusions based upon it and the context in which it's being presented is another matter.

Okay.  Can you give me an example of a piece of evidence, which you believe is authentic, that doesn't justify the conclusion reached, based upon that piece of evidence?

[Bill Brown]

This might surprise you, but I think most of the evidence that we know is probably authentic. Whether it justifies the conclusions based upon it and the context in which it's being presented is another matter.

Okay.  Can you give me an example of a piece of evidence, which you believe is authentic, that doesn't justify the conclusion reached, based upon that piece of evidence?

[Martin Weidmann]

Okay.  Can you give me an example of a piece of evidence, which you believe is authentic, that doesn't justify the conclusion reached, based upon that piece of evidence?

This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity..

Yeah, right.....

You've already shown your true colors again in another thread. I have no intention to go further with this conversation..

[Bill Brown]

This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity..

Yeah, right.....

You've already shown your true colors again in another thread. I have no intention to go further with this conversation..

Stop being so dramatic all the time.

To me, it appears that you aren't comfortable with listing pieces of evidence against Oswald that you feel are authentic... or you feel that there isn't any evidence against Oswald that you feel is authentic.

Which is it?

[Martin Weidmann]

Stop being so dramatic all the time.

To me, it appears that you aren't comfortable with listing pieces of evidence against Oswald that you feel are authentic... or you feel that there isn't any evidence against Oswald that you feel is authentic.

Which is it?

No dramatics, its only a matter of time before you turn nasty. It's in your nature. You can not have a normal discussion because you need to win and feel superior all the time and when you get stuck (which you will deny ever doing) you either run or show us your nasty side. This time the latter just happened a bit faster than last time, that's all.

And I don't really give a damn how it appears to you?

[Bill Brown]

No dramatics, its only a matter of time before you turn nasty. It's in your nature. You can not have a normal discussion because you need to win and feel superior all the time and when you get stuck (which you will deny ever doing) you either run or show us your nasty side. This time the latter just happened a bit faster than last time, that's all.

And I don't really give a damn how it appears to you?

I showed my supposed "nasty side"?  This thread is but two pages long.  Where did I get nasty?

I did ask in all sincerity... and I'll ask in all sincerity again...

Can you list one piece of evidence, which supports Oswald being guilty, that you believe is authentic?