For Martin Weidmann, re: Validity of Evidence

[Ray Mitcham]

He did dig deeper: He just dug up a 600 year-old-word 
Seems he's getting all lathered up...

Did you have  to look it up on Merriam Webster, Bill?

[Rob Caprio]

BUMP

===================================

This reminds me of the Ben Holmes/Walt Cakebread show on ACJ. Aah, the memories.

[Bill Chapman]

Did you have  to look it up on Merriam Webster, Bill?

Is that a problem for you
Do you foam at the mouth when posting... don't go getting yourself in a lather, now

[Bill Brown]

BUMP

=================================

I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity...

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

Would you mind listing a piece of evidence in the case, which points to Oswald's guilt, that you DO consider authentic?  Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

[Jerry Freeman]

Did you have  to look it up on Merriam Webster, Bill?

Honestly, I had to look it up. I thought it meant some kind of bodily fluid

[John Iacoletti]

BUMP

=================================

I created this thread versus hijacking other threads.  This thread is not intended to mock.  I ask in all sincerity...

Martin Weidmann, John Iacoletti,

Would you mind listing a piece of evidence in the case, which points to Oswald's guilt, that you DO consider authentic?  Or, if you'd rather, I can list various pieces of evidence and you can let me know if you accept it as valid or not.

List various pieces of evidence that you think point to Oswald's guilt and define what you mean by "authentic".

[Bill Chapman]

List various pieces of evidence that you think point to Oswald's guilt and define what you mean by "authentic".

Let me point out that Lee Harvey Oswald was the only person on the face of the earth who can be identified as being on the scene during both murders

Take that little gem to the (blood) bank

[Steve M. Galbraith]

Let me point out that Lee Harvey Oswald was the only person on the face of the earth who can be identified as being on the scene during both murders

Take that little gem to the (blood) bank

I'll add that it seems to me that someone who expects help, someone who is part of a larger conspiracy involving powerful elements or figures wouldn't shoot a police officer. Not in broad daylight, not in such an obvious manner.

Oswald's shooting of Tippit was the act of a desperate person, someone essentially fighting for his life. It's why he didn't worry about hiding the shells.

It's impossible here to prove a negative: that is prove that Oswald didn't have help. But if he did have help they must not have been people who he thought could free him if caught. Otherwise why blow away Tippit?