JFK?s missing BRAIN was stolen by Robert Kennedy after assassination to stop it

[Richard Rubio]

SWIPING THE EVIDENCE JFK?s missing BRAIN was stolen by Robert Kennedy after assassination to stop it ever going on display, secret US government files claim
The long-running mystery of the missing brain of assassinated President Kennedy may have finally been solved

By Joe Brophy
22nd November 2018, 1:25 pmUpdated: 22nd November 2018, 3:34 pm
JFK?s missing BRAIN was stolen by Robert Kennedy after his assassination to stop it ever going on display, according to secret US government files.

President Kennedy was murdered 55 years ago today but one of the greatest enigmas surrounding his death remains the location of his brain that mysteriously vanished.

JFK?s missing BRAIN was stolen to stop it ever going on displayREUTERS

JFK?s missing BRAIN was stolen to stop it ever going on display

Bombshell US Government documents actually back-up long-running claims that blame JFK's younger brother RFK for swiping the brain.

Files compiled by the House Select Committee on Assassinations, which probed JFK's murder, suggest the brain may have been pinched to ?prevent future display?.

The document reads: ?Circumstantial evidence tends to show that Robert Kennedy either destroyed these materials or otherwise rendered them inaccessible?.

"It would seem to indicate that Robert Kennedy then decided to retain possession of all physical specimen evidence and transferred only the autopsy photographs and X-rays to the Government."

President Kennedy in the limousine in Dallas, Texas, seconds before the assassinationREUTERS

President Kennedy in the limousine in Dallas, Texas, seconds before the assassination
Robert Kennedy has been labelled the man responsible for swiping his brother's brainGETTY - CONTRIBUTOR

Robert Kennedy has been labelled the man responsible for swiping his brother's brain
The whereabouts of JFK's brain has puzzled theorists for years after it was removed during the President's autopsy and later disappeared from the National Archives.

Conspiracists claimed the missing organ vanished to conceal evidence that Kennedy was not shot from the back by Lee Harvey Oswald, but from the front.

A 2013 book called End of Days: The Assassination of John F. Kennedy, first claimed that an inquiry ordered by then attorney-general, Ramsey Clark, indicated that RFK was the thief.

The latest US government documents incredibly seem to agree with this theory, noting RFK wanted to keep hold of the brain to prevent "public display".

Robert Kennedy lies on the ground after being shot three times by Sirhan Bishara SirhanGETTY - CONTRIBUTOR

Robert Kennedy lies on the ground after being shot three times by Sirhan Bishara Sirhan
US assistant attorney general Burke Marshall told the investigators: "Robert Kennedy obtained and disposed of these materials himself, without informing anyone else.?

The report states Marshall added: "[He] was concerned that these materials would be placed on public display and wished to dispose of them to eliminate such a possibility.

?[He] emphasized that he does not believe anyone other than Robert Kennedy would have known what happened to the materials and is certain that obtaining or locating these materials is no longer possible.?

Robert Kennedy was killed on November 20, 1968, moments after winning the California primary in the race to become the Democratic candidate for the Presidency.

He was shot three times by Palestinian-born Sirhan Bishara Sirhan and died the following day after failing to regain consciousness.

The murders of both Kennedy brothers have been the subject of numerous conspiracy theories since their deaths.

LINK DELETED: Links To websites which contain materials or links to materials which are unsuitable for viewing by minors is forbidden

[Allan Fritzke]

That was about the most useless article I have ever read Richard Rubio and it said absolutely nothing!

That is about par for the journalists who tend to paint a story backed by no facts!  I could post this article and learn nothing new either!

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/world/2018/11/22/cia-saudi-crown-prince-jamal-khashoggi-killing-report/2085273002/

"A Turkish newspaper claimed Thursday that the Central Intelligence Agency has heard a "smoking gun phone call" of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman with an alleged instruction to "silence Jamal Khashoggi as soon as possible."

"The crown prince gave an instruction to silence Jamal Khashoggi as soon as possible and this instruction was captured during (a) CIA wiretapping," the paper claimed. "

"Khaled bin Salman is Saudi Arabia?s U.S. ambassador. H?rriyet Daily News did not identify the source of its claim. "

"The Washington Post previously reported that the CIA concluded the crown prince ordered Khashoggi's assassination in Istanbul."

Where is evidence? Hearsay??? It is all true! Start a rumor and it becomes a fact!

There is so many news articles about having evidence of certain events occurring but not one shred of evidence is ever presented. Let those people that claim to have all this evidence release it to the general public and back up all these wild claims once and for all or don't make a claim at all! What kind of media monster would produce stories without facts?

Rather than sending a hit squad of 15 to do a hit job in your embassy, would it not have been easier to hire a silent assassin to knock him off? I guess these people really are dumb or someone has an ulterior motive in introducing these rabbit trails and having him done in at an embassy!

There is a way to end all the BS. It is called transparency. Is it okay to leak nonfactual material? If it is not in national interest or national security  - it should be withheld from circulation. Newspapers and organizations have no right to leak insidious information unless they have facts to back it up. You can't have it both ways. If you make a statement about the evidence you have, why not just let it out in a forthcoming manner with the facts? Is this not Propaganda's rule #1. Start rumors as facts and never present facts to back up the rumours? Let them self-feed!

The article you posted makes statements but never gives any evidence!

[Alan Hardaker]

The story is attributed to The Sun. The Sun is a down market British tabloid " newspaper". It specialises in tittle-tattle, show biz gossip. Main claim to fame: explicit Page 3 topless models. The paper has been sued numerous times for printing poorly researched articles and in some cases downright lies. It is not a serious newspaper.

Nothing of any serious significance in the article.

[Steve Howsley]

The story is attributed to The Sun. The Sun is a down market British tabloid " newspaper". It specialises in tittle-tattle, show biz gossip. Main claim to fame: explicit Page 3 topless models. The paper has been sued numerous times for printing poorly researched articles and in some cases downright lies. It is not a serious newspaper.

Nothing of any serious significance in the article.

In other words a typical Murdoch rag that is useful for placing under the cat tray.