You've got NO candidate to supplant Oswald as prime suspect. I've posted two topics requesting same, but y'all seem caught out like a deer in the headlights. Why is that?
My research reveals that 5 witnesses ID'd Oswald at the Tippit scene: another one saw him with pistol raised up, walking right past him, muttering something about a poor dumb cop.
Yes... Oswald, who just happened to work in the building that gave a somewhat opportunistic shooter a bird's eye view to a kill.
But how does any of this make Oswald a lone nut assassin? This isn't a courtroom, we are only discussing the relevance of any fingerprint evidence. God forbid we try to piece together the puzzle on a JFK forum.
The problem with the LNer position is they aren't actually LNers, they are "Coincidence Theorists" (CTs) and all their eggs are in the LNer basket. They can't concede a single point or they are done. LHO must have done it exactly the way the WC lays out or it all goes up in smoke. Imagine decades shilling for the conspirators. In for a penny.
My only point to this thread was to expose blatant anomalies in the data. I Googled the "lack of prints do not exonerate Oswald" sites and I agree, generally that prints don't always show up in the frequency you would expect, however, they do not address Oswald's case specifically. We are talking about EXTENSIVE handling of several items and only 6 prints total and nary a print on the rifle. You don't need to be an expert to know BS when you smell it. And this is all a game of public opinion, after all. Not some LNer courtroom where you guys can deny any damn thing you like for any reason just because the CTs don't have a smoking gun.
The conspirators thank you LNers for your patronage as the few remaining laugh themselves into the sunset.
