Proof JFK was killed as a result of a conspiracy.

[John Mytton]

JohnM

[Joe Elliott]

Know?  How can you possibly know for sure when no hard credible proof of such has come forward in 55 years?  Let?s be reasonable. You may believe he was killed by a conspiracy.  Belief is something one has in the absence of actual evidence.  People believe Bigfoot exists.  Actual evidence?  None.  You?re no different than those people. That?s scary huh?

1. The Mary Moorman photo shows a person behind Mr. Zapruder.
2. The Nix film shows a smoke trail from a person behind Mr. Zapruder.
3. Mr. Zapruder said in an interview and testimony that he thought the shots came right from behind him.
4. Mr. Newman said in an interview and in his testimony that he thought the shots came from the shelter behind him.

Your job is to prove either of 1, 2, 3, or 4 wrong.  Prove that these undeniable facts are not true.

On each of these 4 points the evidence of Bigfoot is more convincing than for the evidence of Bigfoot. More convincing until one contemplates the existence of an animal that always avoids being shot or run over or even leaving being a few hairs, like all other real animals do, over a wide area, decade after decade.

If one believes in the JFK assassination conspiracy, one should feel no embarrassment over believing in Bigfoot or UFOs.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

On each of these 4 points the evidence of Bigfoot is more convincing than for the evidence of Bigfoot. More convincing until one contemplates the existence of an animal that always avoids being shot or run over or even leaving being a few hairs, like all other real animals do, over a wide area, decade after decade.

If one believes in the JFK assassination conspiracy, one should feel no embarrassment over believing in Bigfoot or UFOs.

Joe, Joe, Joe - You are a conspiracy theorist without any proof.  Show your proof instead of spewing worthless innuendoes.  Where is the proof?  You just put your worthless opinions out there against hard evidence in photo, film, interview, and testimony.

[Joe Elliott]

Keyvan, Keyvan, Keyvan. You speak falsehoods. I am not a conspiracy theorist at all.

Does the Nix film really show more proof of conspiracy than the Patterson film of Bigfoot? Does not Moorman photograph show more proof of conspiracy than various still pictures of Bigfoot? My point is, the evidence of a JFK assassination conspiracy does not even rise to the level of the very dubious evidence of Bigfoot.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

Keyvan, Keyvan, Keyvan. You speak falsehoods. I am not a conspiracy theorist at all.

Does the Nix film really show more proof of conspiracy than the Patterson film of Bigfoot? Does not Moorman photograph show more proof of conspiracy than various still pictures of Bigfoot? My point is, the evidence of a JFK assassination conspiracy does not even rise to the level of the very dubious evidence of Bigfoot.

Not true Joe.  The Nix film shows shots fired from the pergola.  The Moorman photo shows a person standing behind Mr. Zapruder.  Mr. Zapruder and Mr. Newman said that they thought the shots came from right behind them.  There is film right after the assassination with what seems to be guns smoke floating around.  Police Officers and Secret Services men have testimony in the Warren Commission stating that they thought the shot came from the shelter.

Facts are facts.  You talking about Bigfoot is nothing more but your attempt at discrediting fact.

You have a problem with facts.  Why?

[Bill Chapman]

You are pushing conspiracy theories with your opinions of what you think is going on in the picture.  How about show proof.  Facts, you have heard of it.

The proof is revealed by eye. No conspiracy required: Just knowledge of perspective. Or just the realization that as a figure moves further back in the picture plane, it diminishes in size.

JohnM's combo now/then pergola image shows the man in the now-pergola on the far right (in black shirt/blue pants/black shoes/proper skin tone) in proper perspective in relation to Sitzman/Zapruder. Additionally, the demonstrated floor level of the pergola clearly reveals the need of either a talent for levitation or access to ladders on the part of your giant-headed shooters.

[Keyvan Shahrdar]

If there's a conspiracy regarding the population of the pergola, blame Mother Nature

The proof is revealed by eye. No conspiracy required: Just knowledge of perspective. Or just the realization that as a figure moves further back in the picture plane, it diminishes it size.

JohnM's combo now/then pergola image shows the man in the now-pergola on the far right (in black shirt/blue pants/black shoes) in proper perspective in relation to Sitzman/Zapruder. Additionally, the demonstrated floor level of the pergola clearly reveals the need of either a talent for levitation or access to ladders on the part of your giant-headed shooters.

You are pushing more conspiracy theories.  Show proof.  You objectifying what you see with your eye is not proof.  Fact is fact.  If you have a problem with these facts, show actual proof that is fact, Chappie!  Blame mother nature, really!

[Steve Logan]

You are asking me to answer your opinions.  It is very simple, the Mary Moorman photo shows that there is a person begins Mr. Zapruder.  Mr. Zapruder and Mr. Newman stated that they believed the shots came behind them.  The Nix Film shows shots fired from that location.  There is testimony from Police Officers and Secret Service men in the Warren Commission about shots coming from that area.  There is film evidence of smoke floating in the area.

The above is proven by photo, film, interview, and testimony from 1st hand sources. 

Accept the truth, it is as simple as that.

Oh I've accepted the truth.
Here's the facts:
1. You can't answer my questions.
2. You've been exposed as a Trash Peddler
3. You don't know the actual meaning of what research is.

If you want any more truth , give me a holler.