You either do not know how to read or you intentionally misrepresent what I posted about the subject (nice way of saying you are lying). I believe it's the latter. Richard Smith is sooooo right about you.
You're in good company -- "Richard Smith" lies about the evidence too.
You posted a quote from the HSCA photo panel saying that the rifle seen in photos being carried out of the TSBD on the day of the assassination was matched to CE139 and tried to misrepresent that as being about the rifle in the backyard photos.
You claimed that the HSCA photo panel identified the rifle in the backyard photos as CE 139 to the exclusion of any other rifle and then when called on that, you "amended" the claim to say that the photo panel said they were identical. Then you "amended" that to say that they said it was identical using different words.
All three versions are false.