Author Topic: The wounds (Read 3910 times)

Louis Earl · « **on:** December 10, 2018, 10:15:43 PM »

I continue to be bothered about the descriptions of the president?s wounds. The Zapruder film saw them; people standing on Elm saw them; Hill and Jackie saw them; the Parkland doctors and nurses saw them; Oneal?s employees saw them; the Bethesda techs, photographer and doctors saw them; Gawlers? employees saw them. And yet there is so much disagreement among them as to what they saw. What is the believable explanation for that?

JFK Assassination Forum · « **on:** December 10, 2018, 10:15:43 PM »

Oscar Navarro · « **Reply #1 on:** December 11, 2018, 12:35:33 AM »

Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

Rob Caprio · « **Reply #2 on:** December 11, 2018, 04:55:40 AM »

Quote from: Oscar Navarro on December 11, 2018, 12:35:33 AM

Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

And yet, the WC didn't do this as they failed to view the autopsy photographs and X-rays. Why?

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #2 on:** December 11, 2018, 04:55:40 AM »

Ray Mitcham · « **Reply #3 on:** December 11, 2018, 10:57:16 AM »

Quote from: Oscar Navarro on December 11, 2018, 12:35:33 AM

Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with AUTHENTIC PROVEN TO BE ORIGINAL photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

There, corrected it for you Oscar.

Louis Earl · « **Reply #4 on:** December 11, 2018, 06:20:33 PM »

That's the rub. I can understand that Hill's and Jackie's recollections might not be trustworthy, but the rest of the people who saw the wounds were quite accustomed to seeing wounds, on both the living and the dead.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #4 on:** December 11, 2018, 06:20:33 PM »

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #5 on:** December 11, 2018, 06:54:26 PM »

Quote from: Ray Mitcham on December 11, 2018, 10:57:16 AM

There, corrected it for you Oscar.

Are you the Thought Police? Are you Big Brother?

I suggest you keep your misrepresentations of what other posters wish to emphasize to the confines of your own reply.

PS: JohnI does 'correct' others people's post, but keeps these 'fixes' of his within the confines of his own reply.

Ray Mitcham · « **Reply #6 on:** December 11, 2018, 07:12:46 PM »

Quote from: Bill Chapman on December 11, 2018, 06:54:26 PM

Are you the Thought Police? Are you Big Brother?

No.

Quote

I suggest you keep your misrepresentations of what other posters wish to emphasize to the confines of your own reply.

Suggest away, Chapman. I couldn't give a rat's ass.

Bill Chapman · « **Reply #7 on:** December 11, 2018, 07:36:32 PM »

Quote from: Ray Mitcham on December 11, 2018, 07:12:46 PM

No.

Suggest away, Chapman. I couldn't give a rat's ass.

Misrepresenation is the lifeblood of you trolls. But lets see where your arse lands if you ever try that on me.

Go ahead, make my day.

JFK Assassination Forum · « **Reply #7 on:** December 11, 2018, 07:36:32 PM »

JFK Assassination Forum

News: