Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: The wounds  (Read 3913 times)

Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
The wounds
« on: December 10, 2018, 10:15:43 PM »
Advertisement
I continue to be bothered about the descriptions of the president?s wounds.  The Zapruder film saw them; people standing on Elm saw them; Hill and Jackie saw them; the Parkland doctors and nurses saw them; Oneal?s employees saw them; the Bethesda techs, photographer and doctors saw them; Gawlers? employees saw them.  And yet there is so much disagreement among them as to what they saw.  What is the believable explanation for that?

JFK Assassination Forum

The wounds
« on: December 10, 2018, 10:15:43 PM »


Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: The wounds
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2018, 12:35:33 AM »
Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: The wounds
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2018, 04:55:40 AM »
Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

And yet, the WC didn't do this as they failed to view the autopsy photographs and X-rays. Why?

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The wounds
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2018, 04:55:40 AM »


Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: The wounds
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2018, 10:57:16 AM »
Can't trust eyewitness testimony alone. It's better to corroborate it with AUTHENTIC PROVEN TO BE ORIGINAL photographic, X-Ray, and careful, extended examination by qualified persons. Even then questions remain.

There, corrected it for you Oscar.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2018, 10:59:59 AM by Ray Mitcham »

Offline Louis Earl

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 131
Re: The wounds
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2018, 06:20:33 PM »
That's the rub.  I can understand that Hill's and Jackie's recollections might not be trustworthy, but the rest of the people who saw the wounds were quite accustomed to seeing wounds, on both the living and the dead.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The wounds
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2018, 06:20:33 PM »


Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The wounds
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2018, 06:54:26 PM »
There, corrected it for you Oscar.

Are you the Thought Police? Are you Big Brother?

I suggest you keep your misrepresentations of what other posters wish to emphasize to the confines of your own reply.

PS: JohnI does 'correct' others people's post, but keeps these 'fixes' of his within the confines of his own reply.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2018, 07:39:35 PM by Bill Chapman »

Offline Ray Mitcham

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 994
Re: The wounds
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2018, 07:12:46 PM »
Are you the Thought Police? Are you Big Brother?
No.
Quote
I suggest you keep your misrepresentations of what other posters wish to emphasize to the confines of your own reply.


Suggest away, Chapman. I couldn't give a rat's ass.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: The wounds
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2018, 07:36:32 PM »
No.

Suggest away, Chapman. I couldn't give a rat's ass.

Misrepresenation is the lifeblood of you trolls. But lets see where your arse lands if you ever try that on me.

Go ahead, make my day.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: The wounds
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2018, 07:36:32 PM »