Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

[Eddie Haymaker]

the shirt is irrelevant

we know exactly where the wounds were

this is a RED HERRING

you are just trying to muddy the waters

I'm sorry it is crystal clear

[Jack Trojan]

Yes, the shirt/jacket bunching proves squat. And the SBF is actually the SBH (Hypothesis) because it is merely a guess and there is NO evidence to support it. Especially the bunching of JFK's clothing. 

Mytton is such a cut and paster who knows squat about ballistics, image analysis and science in general. There is only 1 thing you need to ask yourself and that is at what vertebrae did the MB strike JFK's back and what vertebrae did it exit his throat? How his jacket bunched is totally irrelevant and proves that you don't know what proof means. A scientist you ain't. So what is your answer Mytton? Here's a hint dufus:





So what vertebrae did the MB smash thru? T1/T2?

What vertebrae did they perform the tracheotomy? C6/C7?

Now draw a straight line from the back wound to the throat to see if it lines up with the 6th floor of the TSBD. What was JFK's body orientation to make it work? Was that his actual body orientation? Do they mesh? This is just simple geometry, no ballistics expert required. So what angle did you get? What angle should you have got? Here's a hint dufus:

Get in between 2 lasers pointed at each other as shown below. Line up the lower laser at your throat at approx. C6/C7. Does the high laser strike your back as per the autopsy photo at T1/T2? Or is it where Gerald Ford moved it to?



We will wait for you to post your "proof" that the SBH was even possible, let alone feasible. Otherwise, you need to give up on all this jacket bunching nonsense and use some common sense for a change.

JTrojan

[Jim Brunsman]

Never mind the fact that several autopsy witnesses reported Humes' struggles to understand why the BULLET DID NOT TRANSIT THE BODY. These witnesses and the Sibert and O'Neill report state that the end of the wound could be felt while probing this wound. How could this missile be any threat to Connally? Answer is simple and it TOTALLY DESTROYS the imbecilic SBT.

[Royell Storing]

Never mind the fact that several autopsy witnesses reported Humes' struggles to understand why the BULLET DID NOT TRANSIT THE BODY. These witnesses and the Sibert and O'Neill report state that the end of the wound could be felt while probing this wound. How could this missile be any threat to Connally? Answer is simple and it TOTALLY DESTROYS the imbecilic SBT.

     

[Eddie Haymaker]

Doesn't this destroy the MBT alone?

It's clearly not a ricochet but a direct hit

The windshield damage could be a ricochet from the final shot

This clearly is not

Jack your wound looks WAY too high.

It looks as If Mr Ford has done some of his handy work on it. lol

Official autopsy say's 3rd thoracic vertebrae (5-6 inches down from the collar)
The evidence fits perfectly



this is where the bullet stopped and why the wound was so shallow

To think people really believe this bullet could find its way to the front of the trachea without smashing the spinal column amazes me.If it did do that all the bone and bullet would have blasted out the front of the trachea and JFK would have died instantly with a golfball sized exit wound in his throat.
Dont forget this bullet is still traversing at high velocity (enough to kill another man) on exiting JFK's neck.

After all that the bullet really GETS CRAZY. It is simply nonsensical.

There's some of our evidence. Where is your's?

[Royell Storing]

Doesn't this destroy the MBT alone?

It's clearly not a ricochet but a direct hit

The windshield damage could be a ricochet from the final shot

This clearly is not

Jack your wound looks WAY too high.

It looks as If Mr Ford has done some of his handy work on it. lol

Official autopsy say's 3rd thoracic vertebrae (5-6 inches down from the collar)
The evidence fits perfectly



this is where the bullet stopped and why the wound was so shallow

To think people really believe this bullet could find its way to the front of the trachea without smashing the spinal column amazes me.If it did do that all the bone and bullet would have blasted out the front of the trachea and JFK would have died instantly with a golfball sized exit wound in his throat.
Dont forget this bullet is still traversing at high velocity (enough to kill another man) on exiting JFK's neck.

After all that the bullet really GETS CRAZY. It is simply nonsensical.

There's some of our evidence. Where is your's?

    Very concise & on point presentation. They have absolutely nowhere to go. Hence the crickets.

[Eddie Haymaker]

I don't have to sell it either, this sh^t sells itself

Thankyou Sir - For your kind words

[Jerry Organ]

Yes, the shirt/jacket bunching proves squat. And the SBF is actually the SBH (Hypothesis) because it is merely a guess and there is NO evidence to support it. Especially the bunching of JFK's clothing. 

Mytton is such a cut and paster who knows squat about ballistics, image analysis and science in general. There is only 1 thing you need to ask yourself and that is at what vertebrae did the MB strike JFK's back and what vertebrae did it exit his throat? How his jacket bunched is totally irrelevant and proves that you don't know what proof means. A scientist you ain't. So what is your answer Mytton? Here's a hint dufus:

Hmm, dufus, that's air in the neck's missile passage. If you think air doesn't compromise bone opacity, look at how faint the ribs (and those parts of the clavicles that are over the lungs) are due to residual air in the lungs.