Was Kennedy's Jacket bunched on Elm Street?

[Michael Walton]

Here are some "new" photos of the clothing. Regardless of the clothing being bunched up or not, there's no way a shot that low could have exited the throat.

[Eddie Haymaker]

I'm sorry guys

I don't see how someone MODERATELY objective could view this simple evidence

And not think something is rotten in Denmark

The misrepresentation and manipulation of evidence in the WR is so obvious

I have been surprised by revelations on this website from CT's

but from the LN'ers I have not seen 1 shred of compelling or revealed evidence

no surprises regarding Oswald's guilt - nothing

Now thats not the LN'ers fault

This case is...when you look into it.Shockingly mishandled almost proving a

conspiracy within itself.(the WR)

Our look into the MB only made it to the third thoracic and sadly could not continue

This whole thread really is a troll though - the shirt bunched?

a red herring - I guess we fell for it

[Royell Storing]

            If the JFK Autopsy photo of his Back is legit, it's Game Over. There is No Way a shot fired Downward from the 6th floor of the TSBD could have exited via his neck. On top of that, the back wound was Shallow.

[Eddie Haymaker]

It would have acted in much the same way as the Connolly back wound

and exited around (slightly above) the nipple

had it not hit bone of course

its not even "ballpark" close

[Jerry Organ]

see the clavicle in your picture

JFK's "exit" wound was a inch above that at the front

So the rear impact has to be higher again

Near horizontal in anatomical-position. The wounding position was different.




JFK's wounding position was about in the middle of what's shown above.

right up into the neck at the rear - no mistake about it.

you don't see a bullet impact?

Sure, I see an "impact" in the frame possibly caused by a metal fragment. I just don't see your so-called "bullet hole."

great defence - glaucoma

I hope santa gives you some new spectacles this year

Ask him for books on basic anatomy and forensics.

[Michael Walton]

Near horizontal in anatomical-position. The wounding position was different.




JFK's wounding position was about in the middle of what's shown above.

Sure, I see an "impact" in the frame possibly caused by a metal fragment. I just don't see your so-called "bullet hole."

Ask him for books on basic anatomy and forensics.

You're getting into Dale Myers comedy territory with that diagram. Myers made Kennedy look like a hunchback in his award-winning cartoon and your diagram is just as bad. How do you account for the downward angle of the bullet from the 6th floor?

[Jerry Organ]

You're getting into Dale Myers comedy territory with that diagram. Myers made Kennedy look like a hunchback in his award-winning cartoon and your diagram is just as bad.

Neither of those 3D profiles represent Kennedy's wounding position. I would say his wounding position fell in between those two position. It does serve to highlight how the cervical spine changes from anatomical position to a seated position.

How do you account for the downward angle of the bullet from the 6th floor?

It's no secret that changes in position change the neck structure. Compare the chin relative to the shoulder line in the following photos.

[Royell Storing]

    Absolutely NO Proof offered above. "In between" = whatever that Specifically means. "Compare the chin relative to the shoulder line" = more blather.  This is the classic Dancing-A-Jig when stuck =