Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy  (Read 34596 times)

Online Richard Smith

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5290
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #168 on: January 13, 2019, 05:13:58 PM »
Advertisement
If the Police had found the letter on the book written in Russian....Then it would have been duly recorded and it would have entered the evidence stream that was created to frame the patsy, and the letter would have been certified evidence .... 

I would not be a bit surprised that our dear Ruthie the innocent Good Samaritan  had suggested that the police search through the Russian books before she departed so that she would  (Deliberately) not be there when the police discovered the letter.

When she discovered that the police had not found the letter, she took the book to the police so that they could give the book to Marina ( who needed that book like she needed a snorkel and swim fins)

So the note was in the book when the DPD searched and they didn't find it?  That will come as news to Caprio.  Why hide it in a book to begin with if the intent of your fantasy conspirators was that it be found?  Why not just stick it among some of Oswald's possessions?  Why attempt to frame Oswald for another assassination to begin with?  Not necessary with the mountain of evidence against him in the JFK assassination.  But if you were going to do that via a note, why not make it more explicit and directly reference Walker?  It doesn't add up as a frame attempt.  By the time the note was found, Oswald was already dead and the authorities were satisfied with his guilt in the JFK assassination.  No need to link him to any other crime.  It would have been risky and unnecessary if Oswald were not the Walker shooter.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #168 on: January 13, 2019, 05:13:58 PM »


Offline Oscar Navarro

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 463
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #169 on: January 14, 2019, 01:00:43 AM »
Navarro, You apparently can't even understand your own post.....

  We have a description on this suspect over here on Jefferson. Last seen about 300 block of East Jefferson. He's a white male, about thirty, five eight, (siren) black hair, slender, wearing white jacket, a white shirt and dark slacks.

Wanted for investigation for assault to murder on a police officer: A white male; approximately thirty; about five foot eight; slender build; has black hair; a white jacket; a white shirt and dark trousers. The suspect last seen running west on Jefferson from 400 East Jefferson. 1:24[/i]

Might can give you some additional information. I got an eye-ball witness to the get-away man. That suspect in this shooting is a white male, twenty-seven, five feet eleven, a hundred sixty-five, black wavy hair, fair complected, wearing a light grey Eisenhower-type jacket, dark trousers and a white shirt, and (. . . ?). Last seen running on the north side of the street from Patton, on Jefferson, on East Jefferson. And he was apparently armed with a 32 dark-finish automatic pistol which he had in his right hand.

Question:.....Mr Navarro,  What was the color of the shirt of the man who shot JD Tippit?  What was the color of the shirt that Lee Oswald was wearing in the Texas Theater?


I'll add the following description from the DPD dispatch of 1:28 PM CST:

"Stand by. Notify 1 that officer involved in this shooting, Officer J.D. Tippit, we believe, was pronounced DOA at Methodist 1:28 p.m.
 
 
4 (Deputy Chief of Police N.T. Fisher)
Is there any indication that it has any connection with this other shooting?
 
Dispatcher
Well, the descriptions on the suspect are similar and it is possible.
 
4
Thank you."


Mr. Cakebread. Are white shirts permanently affixed to the body?




Offline Walt Cakebread

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7322
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #170 on: January 14, 2019, 07:01:46 PM »
So the note was in the book when the DPD searched and they didn't find it?  That will come as news to Caprio.  Why hide it in a book to begin with if the intent of your fantasy conspirators was that it be found?  Why not just stick it among some of Oswald's possessions?  Why attempt to frame Oswald for another assassination to begin with?  Not necessary with the mountain of evidence against him in the JFK assassination.  But if you were going to do that via a note, why not make it more explicit and directly reference Walker?  It doesn't add up as a frame attempt.  By the time the note was found, Oswald was already dead and the authorities were satisfied with his guilt in the JFK assassination.  No need to link him to any other crime.  It would have been risky and unnecessary if Oswald were not the Walker shooter.

So the note was in the book when the DPD searched and they didn't find it?

Who knows??...  Perhaps Mrs Good Samaritan,  Ruthie....

Why hide it in a book to begin with if the intent of your fantasy conspirators was that it be found?

Duh!....  If the note had been discovered by happenstance during a police search there would have been a mystery and conjecture about where the note had originated which would have necessitated the questioning of Marina about the note. ( which is exactly what happened....OTOH ...If Ruthie had presented the note, obviously she would have been questioned about how she had came into possession of the note.  By pretending that she didn't know that the note was there and was merely delivering a book that Marina needed ( like a snorkel mask) and as a good Samaritan she eliminated herself as having any knowledge of the note.

Why attempt to frame Oswald for another assassination to begin with?

HUH??  What other assassination?

Not necessary with the mountain of evidence against him in the JFK assassination.

"Mountain" of evidence against him....  The "mountain" was very similar to that mountain range in Kansas....Which most Kansans'  usually referred to as gopher mounds....   The evidence against Lee was very weak and flimsy, just as J' Edgar Hoover and Nick Katzenbach acknowledged  when they drafted the memo in which Hoover had directed LBJ ... "We must create a letter or memo for the Pissant public in which we can hoodwink the Pissants into believing that Lee Oswald was a lunatic who shot our beloved President for no reason at all. 

Hoover had informed LBJ that they had a very weak case against the patsy, Lee Harrrrrrvey Ossssswald......

By the time the note was found, Oswald was already dead and the authorities were satisfied with his guilt in the JFK assassination.  No need to link him to any other crime.  It would have been risky and unnecessary if Oswald were not the Walker shooter.

That's simply Bull stuff....  At the time the note surfaced, The FBI needed to open the questioning of Marina about the Walker hoax....A German Newspaper had spilled the beans that Walker had called the paper's editor about 12 hours after the murder of JFK and told the editor that the man in the custody of the Dallas police was the guy who had tried to shoot him on April 10, of 1963.  So the fat was in the fire....and Hoover was desperate to make damned sure that the public knew that Lee Harrrrrvey Ossssswald was a killer...( even though he hadn't killed anybody)
« Last Edit: January 14, 2019, 07:29:22 PM by Walt Cakebread »

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #170 on: January 14, 2019, 07:01:46 PM »


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #171 on: January 15, 2019, 10:09:47 PM »
Translation...

"I cannot provide testimony (or any document) which shows that the officers literally shook the pages of each book."

Translation:

Brown CANNOT show that the alleged note that NEVER mentions Walker was in any book inside Ruth Paine's house as claimed by his beloved WC.

Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #172 on: January 15, 2019, 10:18:54 PM »
And think about the counternarrative being implied here.  For some reason RP and the sinister conspirators fabricate this evidence but for some inexplicable reason don't put it in a place and time where the authorities will find it during the search.  Afterward they stick it in a random book and hope they do.  Quite a plan.  And then they don't mention Walker in the note.   Is that how anyone would go about trying to link Oswald to the Walker shooting?  LOL.

***Shifting of the Burden Alert***

The diehard WC endorsers CANNOT support the WC's claim (What else is new?) about the alleged note so they go off on tangents about the CTers instead to distract.

Why can't they ever support the WC's claims? LOL indeed.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #172 on: January 15, 2019, 10:18:54 PM »


Offline Rob Caprio

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1094
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #173 on: January 15, 2019, 10:20:18 PM »
Richard, that's just too much common sense for Caprio and Cakebread.  You're going to make their heads explode.  Be careful.

Please point out the common sense in his nonsensical reply.

Offline Steve Howsley

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 437
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #174 on: January 15, 2019, 10:33:11 PM »
Please point out the common sense in his nonsensical reply.

It is beyond your ability to comprehend.

Offline Bill Chapman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6513
Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #175 on: January 15, 2019, 11:00:19 PM »
Richard, that's just too much common sense for Caprio and Cakebread.  You're going to make their heads explode.  Be careful.


JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Ruth Paine - Absolutely part of a conspiracy
« Reply #175 on: January 15, 2019, 11:00:19 PM »