The Magic Bullet - Fact or Fiction?

[Eddie Haymaker]

buddy

This case is a donkey

The bullet has to hit JFK well into his neck

and not his back

I have proven why on this thread

If you dont think so - prove otherwise

stop with the broken record routine

[Walt Cakebread]

At least an inch higher than the clavicle (feel that on your neck)

Which means the rear bullet had to strike higher than that from behind

It has to hit JFK squarely in the lower neck - which is NOT EVEN CLOSE

To the actual wounds.Clearly shot in the upper back and not the neck (official

autopsy photos wiki page) The MB would be an OBVIOUS neck shot from behind.



This wound is obviously too low to support the MBT.

you see the unusual wound shape? Surgical tweezers/clamps have removed     

the bullet and left their telltale marks on the wound.



ALL THE EVIDENCE STACKED UP HERE BY THE WR

PROVES 5-6 INCHES DOWN FROM THE COLLAR

The WR says the MB did not hit bone in JFK

So he apparently had no spinal column

Because the front "exit" wound is directly in the middle of the throat

and the bullet exited at high velocity

It therefore HAD to smash through the spinal column even If

people try to move the wound about (which they have since 1963)

which would have obviously killed Kennedy instantaneously



This picture is my personal favourite - you see no spine




This simple picture totally destroys the Magic Bullet Myth

It is taken by an unassuming photographer at parkland minutes after arrival

Its a clear perfectly round symmetrical bullet impact and not a ricochet

The MB is a practical impossibility and is contrary to much of the governments   
 
own evidence

This simple picture totally destroys the Magic Bullet Myth

It is taken by an unassuming photographer at parkland minutes after arrival

Its a clear perfectly round symmetrical bullet impact and not a ricochet

You're makin hay and are absolutely right on this point Mr Haymaker...

By knowing the dimensions of the rear view mirror bracket and scaling the photo, it's possible to find the dimension of the bullet that made the dent in the chrome molding....  I performed this exercise decades ago and found that the bullet was either a .44 or a .45 caliber bullet....  Since a .45 caliber ACP cartridge fires a bullet at subsonic velocity, and that big slow moving bullet has very poor penetrating ability , I suspect that the bullet that made the dent was fired from a .45 caliber weapon.

[Andrew Mason]

buddy

This case is a donkey

The bullet has to hit JFK well into his neck

and not his back

I have proven why on this thread

If you dont think so - prove otherwise

stop with the broken record routine

Just as I expected: Your inability to answer the simple questions show that you have not actually worked out the trajectory. So why would you expect us to treat your objection to the path through JFK seriously?

[Andrew Mason]

This simple picture totally destroys the Magic Bullet Myth

It is taken by an unassuming photographer at parkland minutes after arrival

Its a clear perfectly round symmetrical bullet impact and not a ricochet

By knowing the dimensions of the rear view mirror bracket and scaling the photo, it's possible to find the dimension of the bullet that made the dent in the chrome molding....  I performed this exercise decades ago and found that the bullet was either a .44 or a .45 caliber bullet....  Since a .45 caliber ACP cartridge fires a bullet at subsonic velocity, and that big slow moving bullet has very poor penetrating ability , I suspect that the bullet that made the dent was fired from a .45 caliber weapon.

You may have a point that the photograph could help disprove the SBT.  As far as I know, the FBI did not extract any metal from the windshield frame when gathering and weighing all the bullet fragments.  That was a significant fragment and some or all of it may have been embedded deep into the frame.  If the fragments exceed the mass of a 6.5 mm bullet, that would disprove the SBT by itself.

[Eddie Haymaker]

well, I don't know about all that

but that bullet looks small

To me it looks like a 5.56 mm

The hole in JFK's shirt is also very small

it all fits

[Andrew Mason]

well, I don't know about all that

but that bullet looks small

To me it looks like a 5.56 mm

The hole in JFK's shirt is also very small

it all fits

The difference between 5.56 mm and 6.5 mm. is less than a millimetre!!  You can see that it is 5.56 and not 6.5 mm just by looking at a photo of a single bullet hole without measurement? 

[Eddie Haymaker]

I would have thought I made it clear it was my opinion

It is a terribly small hole for a rifle

It could be 6.5 mm of course

------------------------------------------------------------

to be clear I don't completely rule out Oswald as a gunman

but there must have also been another man firing from behind

and of course one from the knoll

My real problem is simply the WR and that Oswald acted alone.

An impossibility IMO

So I guess I agree with the HSCA's final judgement

There was a conspiracy involving at least one other gunman

who was involved and how large a group it was - Is open to conjecture

[Eddie Haymaker]

c'mon nutters

prove this MB BS