If Oswald was indeed the applicant in question...Why couldn't the Cuban council in Mexico City identify him?
No one has even tried to answer that one. TESTIMONY OF SENOR EUSEBIO AZCUE LOPEZ, FORMER CUBAN CONSUL IN MEXICO CITY ------------------------------ http://mcadams.posc.mu.edu/russ/jfkinfo/hscaascu.htm
Why do experts say eyewitness accounts are notoriously unreliable? For example, I suggest reading up on the research by Elizabeth Loftus.
I thought the one thing, probably the only thing, both sides - lone assassin believers and conspiracy advocates - agreed upon is that eyewitness accounts cannot be relied upon. There has to be corroborating evidence.
In this matter, there is: other accounts, physical evidence, photos, handwriting/signature, visa applications, circumstantial. We need to consider the totality of evidence and not simply one piece.
So you dismiss all of this other evidence because Azcue said the man he saw didn't appear to be Oswald?
In any case, I'll answer it: Azcue was wrong. Note that he also said in his testimony that the man in the visa photos was NOT the same man he saw and that the dress of the man in the photos was not the same. He testified that the man he saw was wearing a suit. Duran said, of course, that the man she met was the same man in the photos and that he was dressed the same. And she has corroborating evidence: the photo and his signature, among other things. Again, I think his memory failed him.
Now, your turn: How do you explain the other eyewitness accounts, the photos, the signatures, the application and the circumstantial evidence that indicates he went there?
