Lack Of Damage To CE-399

[Steve Howsley]

Unfortunately many of the loons and kooks have gotten their impression of how a trial would have played out from the 1992 fantasy book by Walt Brown "The People Vs. Lee Harvey Oswald"    .......   Evidence and proof are casually thrown out like the Big Mac wrappers at a Trump state dinner.

Jerry, That is Champagne Comedy!!     

[Royell Storing]

Are we still discussing a bullet that appears to have no visible damage?

Oh, so you were discussing a bullet that had no visible damage.
My bad, all along I thought the discussion was about CE 399

@Newbies: You'll never see any CTer post this image

        That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet. This is right in line with the JFK Autopsy Photo where a Dr is pulling JFK's hair Up & Over the Entire Back of his Head. Like the audience viewing a David Copperfield performance, this chicanery prompts everyone to ask themselves, "Just What is this guy trying to hide?"

[Walt Cakebread]

        That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet. This is right in line with the JFK Autopsy Photo where a Dr is pulling JFK's hair Up & Over the Entire Back of his Head. Like the audience viewing a David Copperfield performance, this chicanery prompts everyone to ask themselves, "Just What is this guy trying to hide?"

Hi Royell.... It's funny that it never registered with my reasoning that there are probably some folks who wouldn't know that the photo is the END VIEW of a projectile and therefore they might believe that the photo shows a badly damaged bullet....

It seems bizarre to me .....But after reading the posts of some members of the forum......I guess it's possible.

[Jerry Freeman]

Are we still discussing a bullet that appears to have no visible damage?Oh, so you were discussing a bullet that had no visible damage. My bad, all along I thought the discussion was about CE 399@Newbies: You'll never see any CTer post this image

 
 If you fire a bullet [even though it is through the vacant head of the strawman that made reply #204] it will certainly cause explosive damage to the base. Something called a PRIMER  If you fire it through a real live body it will be seriously damaged. Go find a bullet that wasn't. I guess Chappo assumes that [newbies] are automatically idiots and do not know this.
   

[Bill Chapman]

 
 If you fire a bullet [even though it is through the vacant head of the strawman that made reply #204] it will certainly cause explosive damage to the base. Something called a PRIMER  If you fire it through a real live body it will be seriously damaged. Go find a bullet that wasn't. I guess Chappo assumes that [newbies] are automatically idiots and do not know this.

The problem is that you earlier claimed that CE399 had no visible damage. If a newbie never sees the butt-end view of CE399 (which CTers never post) he will be misled and your agenda to screw around with the facts will continue.

If you fire it through a real live body it will be seriously damaged. Go find a bullet that wasn't
Surely you are not talking about FMJ ammo

@Newbies
FMJ ammo is designed to resist damage while passing through flesh. FMJ ammunition was designed in the late 1800s for use in military rifles. Not long after this, the Hague Convention of 1899 made it illegal to use bullets that easily expand or flatten inside the body. The agreement held that the bullets used by the signatories could not open upon impact, such as hollow points. This is because full metal jacket rounds were likely to cause a "through and through" wound instead of mushrooming and causing a more grievous wound after impact

Again, here's the CE399 butt-end image that CTers never post

[Bill Chapman]

        That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet. This is right in line with the JFK Autopsy Photo where a Dr is pulling JFK's hair Up & Over the Entire Back of his Head. Like the audience viewing a David Copperfield performance, this chicanery prompts everyone to ask themselves, "Just What is this guy trying to hide?"

That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet

LOL 

But 100% of the rear view. See the side view for the other 90%
By your calculations, it seems you guys are the ones hiding something... that 10% 

But congrats on being the first CTer to include the CE399 butt-end view in a post.

[Jerry Freeman]

That photo of CE 399 does Not display roughly 90% of the bullet LOL 
But 100% of the rear view. See the side view for the other 90% By your calculations, it seems you guys are the ones hiding something... that 10%But congrats on being the first CTer  to include the CE399 butt-end view in a post.

So the bullet came out backwards 
   
So much drivel over the most improbable theory [Only because if it doesn't work ...then it doesn't work]

[Walt Cakebread]

So the bullet came out backwards 
   
So much drivel over the most improbable theory [Only because if it doesn't work ...then it doesn't work]

I have in my possession a 6.5mm carcano bullet that I fired into a water trap.... It looks nearly identical to CE 399...  My bullet is of Italian manufacture so the jacket is white colored metal....