Users Currently Browsing This Topic:
0 Members

Author Topic: Lack Of Damage To CE-399  (Read 90918 times)

Offline Tim Nickerson

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1825
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #320 on: April 13, 2020, 07:25:58 AM »
Advertisement
Those fragments, along with CE 399 ( including the two fragments found in the limo), when weighed and added together, would end up with a weight far greater than one bullet.

Why are you including fragments found in the limo? They never came from CE 399. The fragments deposited in Connally came from CE 399. The total mass of the six fragments deposited in Connally comes no where near to exceeding the mass missing from CE 399.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #320 on: April 13, 2020, 07:25:58 AM »


Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #321 on: April 13, 2020, 07:09:31 PM »
Why are you including fragments found in the limo? They never came from CE 399. The fragments deposited in Connally came from CE 399. The total mass of the six fragments deposited in Connally comes no where near to exceeding the mass missing from CE 399.
The large mangled pieces of bullet found in the limo came from the head shot on JFK.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #322 on: April 13, 2020, 08:51:57 PM »
Are you sure the bullet now in evidence as CE399 was ever at Parkland Hospital?

Absolutely not sure. It could have been introduced into evidence at any point in place of whatever was "found" at Parkland. The provenance of CE-399 is as pathetic as all the other evidence that the DPD and FBI mishandled.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #322 on: April 13, 2020, 08:51:57 PM »


Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #323 on: April 13, 2020, 08:55:22 PM »
The large mangled pieces of bullet found in the limo came from the head shot on JFK.

Linky to the report that proves this pls. It better include the fragments extracted from JFK's brain and compared with the larger pieces.

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #324 on: April 14, 2020, 01:25:45 AM »
Linky to the report that proves this pls. It better include the fragments extracted from JFK's brain and compared with the larger pieces.

Its common sense. How else did they get in the limo? They were hardly thrown in.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #324 on: April 14, 2020, 01:25:45 AM »


Offline Martin Weidmann

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7444
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #325 on: April 14, 2020, 01:33:37 AM »
Its common sense. How else did they get in the limo? They were hardly thrown in.

How do you know the fragments now in evidence came from the limo? More "common sense", perhaps?

Online Gerry Down

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1055
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #326 on: April 14, 2020, 01:34:35 AM »
How do you know the fragments now in evidence came from the limo? More "common sense", perhaps?

It seems like such a big clumsy plot to be planting evidence like those fragments.

Offline Jack Trojan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 842
Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #327 on: April 14, 2020, 02:38:28 AM »
It seems like such a big clumsy plot to be planting evidence like those fragments.

But what if those fragments didn't match the other planted evidence? Those fragments might have been found in the limo but there is no provenance for it or practically any of the evidence in this case. Why did they "clean up" the limo by removing and destroying the windshield with the bullet hole in it? Wouldn't it be insane to tamper with crucial evidence found in the limo? And if they were willing to scrub the limo, then why wouldn't they swap out or manufacture bullet fragments previously shot by the planted rifle? The CIA and FBI weren't amateurs at this stuff.

JFK Assassination Forum

Re: Lack Of Damage To CE-399
« Reply #327 on: April 14, 2020, 02:38:28 AM »