Again with the false equivalacies, but not at all surprising coming from Strawman "Richard".
Booth's diary was found on his person, not identified as his handwriting via 2 block letters on a photo of a microfilm copy of a 2-inch order blank.
Because you don't have any actual evidence that Oswald shot anybody, so you have to resort to gymnastics over the purchase of the weapon.
I'm speechless at your inability to read. I said that the theatre full of people saw him leap from the balcony.
False equivalence. Booth was a famous actor who theater patrons knew well. Oswald was identified in unfair rigged lineups by people who didn't know him and described him differently.
Booth was seen in the theater box with a gun in his hand immediately after Lincoln was shot. Oswald was seen in a different location a couple minutes after JFK was shot with no gun in his hand. See how that works?
Nobody saw Oswald do anything. It's not surprising that you don't see the difference, because to you speculation is considered evidence.
Cool. Any evidence of this mental instability in 1865? Clara Harris and Mary Todd were in the presidential box too.
Witnesses who saw Oswald shoot JFK: ZERO
The only reason you have to pretend you know that it was "Oswald's rifle" is because you don't have anything else. In Booth's case they had eyewitnesses. They had accomplices. They had a diary. They didn't have to resort to nonsense like "he left his ring in a cup" as "evidence".
Booth: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Oswald: I really don't know what the situation is about. Nobody has told me anything.
But if you want to make a case for reasonable doubt in Lincoln's murder, then knock yourself out. It does nothing to advance your case against Oswald.
Booth's diary was found on his person
Oswald's wallet containing Hidell ID was found on Oswald's person.
Because you don't have any actual evidence that Oswald shot anybody,
And unless you have evidence that someone saw some guy actually pull the trigger then you got nothing.
so you have to resort to gymnastics over the purchase of the weapon.
How is following a paper/evidence trail that leads from Kleins records straight to the 6th floor of Oswald's building "gymnastics"?
I said that the theatre full of people saw him leap from the balcony.
Saw "who" jump from the balcony, was this person ever positively identified in an "unfair lineup"? -giggle-
Oswald was identified in unfair rigged lineups
An unfair rigged lineup contains only 1 person who is holding the weapon, Oswald's lineup's were nothing like that.
Booth was seen in the theater box with a gun in his hand immediately after Lincoln was shot.
In a darkened theater, what could they possibly see?
Oswald was seen in a different location a couple minutes after JFK was shot with no gun in his hand. See how that works?
Oops, Brennan saw Oswald in the sniper's nest, you know the sniper's nest with Oswald fresh prints on the recently moved rifle rest box.
Nobody saw Oswald do anything.
See above and don't forget when Oswald was approached by Police Officers he struck McDonald and then tried to kill McDonald with his revolver.
Witnesses who saw Oswald shoot JFK: ZERO
No, see above.
In Booth's case they had eyewitnesses.
Eyewitnesses who didn't see some guy actually pull the trigger? LOL!
They had a diary.
What, so the handwriting analysis is based on an "unscientific" opinion, you gotta do better than that.
Booth: Sic Semper Tyrannis
Oswald: Well, it's all over now
But if you want to make a case for reasonable doubt in Lincoln's murder, then knock yourself out. It does nothing to advance your case against Oswald.
No, it's just fun exposing a lazy contrarian who applies Polar different conclusions to essentially the same type of evidence.
JohnM
