Life magazine printed 30 frames from the Zapruder film a week later in the 29th of November 1963 issue and considering the time it took to get the film and then the time it takes to organise, write, format, print and then get the magazine distributed across the country left the amount of time the conspirators had to do any alteration to be a couple of days at most.
In the following gif the Life magazine photos have superimposed over the original Zapruder Film and all the way through the most important events we get a perfect match to every image which means that to add a new element across a number of frames then there will be a knock on effect to these surrounding frames. The only frames we don't see are the actual headshot and the resulting back and to the left but if you had the time wouldn't these frames be the ones you would alter? Doh!
So in conclusion these Life Magazine photos published a week later are all the proof anyone needs to show no Zapruder fakery.
But in addition to this powerful evidence there is;
perfect synchronization between the Muchmore/Nix and the Zapruder films
the impossible to fake ghost image in the sprocket area is an accurate representation of images captured with Zapruder's type of camera
and upon microscopic examination the Zapruder film shows the correct and overall consistent grain level for the relevant Kodak film stock.
JohnM
So, what is your point? You have just pointed out in your discussion that the only shots that aren't shown are actually the important ones?
Doh! You don't need to alter hundreds of frames - that is absurd!
Wouldn't the missing ones be the ones to alter? Absolutely. That is why they aren't shown. The shown frames are
uninteresting and not altered!
Frame
Z313/Z314 don't contain anything "except paint" and they don't show those anyway. The rest in the sequence after those are of utmost importance to show the actual sequence of events and the kill shots. I cover the logic of this statement that I am making with the following list of 11 points. I cover why the missing pictures are the most important ones and will never give a conflict with those that were shown. There never will be a conflict as those AP photos shown are the "non-issue" undoctored ones anyway! You could also advance the argument that they aren't going to use them all anyway for their paper and that is why none of those ever showed up!
Look at the photographic evidence presented:1) There is absolutely no reaction by Mrs. Kennedy at
Z313/314 and no jiggle or reaction in Zapruder's camera. Could you imagine being 18 inches beside a spray of blood and brain matter and what her face would look like after going through a volley like that? She would have been blinded and would have immediately raised her hands and wiped her eyes clean so she could see. No evidence of that whatsoever. Policeman on bikes claimed they were hit with brain matter. What about her? No reaction as she continues to show concern as she did from the time of the neck shot.
2) Those 2 frames were the incriminating evidence that was used to incriminate a dead Lee Harvey Oswald who supposedly fired his bolt action sniper rifle from the "sniper's nest"! The first neck shot occurred at about
Z224 and produced no visible damage other than the President raising his hands to his neck and slumping forward. Then LHO takes another shot or two from the 6th floor of TSBD building at Z313. LHO was dead so remained unquestioned, NO alibi and NO statement was taken when he went to police stations and spent considerable time there - very questionable and concerning that police would neglect to take a statement! A very convenient couple of picture with "blood plume" have gun, gun casings, ownership papers and lead bullets. That makes a conviction conviction de facto. Never mind he had no motive - unless he did it for his
handlers.3) Given that no one wants to testify that JFK's head moved back about a foot and that he raised his arm in a defensive maneuver after this supposed shot - should lead you to question once more that there is a contradiction in visual evidence. If you put yourself in JFK's shoes and you actually saw the shooter at the front of the car, imagine what your reaction would be? The testimony of James Altgens, an AP reporter, (issued into the WC report about 6 months after the shooting), failed to see this obvious movement. His testimony reported that he was about 15 feet away at the time of the fatal shot but he failed to snap the shutter! He did get a picture of the bacj if the limousine a little farther down though which was headlined in many newspapers across the world. That particular picture which an astute AP News Reporter should have taken has never shown up and disappeared. What he did note in his testimony 6 months later was that there was a slight frontal movement of Kennedy's head. Obviously this is collaborating evidence to suggest a bullet coming from behind pushing the head forward!!! He failed to note the rather obvious movement back and the raising of the arm - which you obviously can't miss when you look at the Zapruder's film. There has been no attempt by anyone to justify the head or arm movement. It was just considered a nerve reaction to having the "massive" head injury at
Z313.
4) The "fireball" appearing on JFK's head quickly disappears and leaves a white face behind. Again the coloring of the "fireball" is fairly close to Mrs. Kennedy's dress and overlaps (blending colors) with an added enhancement of catching the "light of course". All evidence of "fireball" is removed by Z321.
5) At
Z322, there is light piercing through the windshield which I have suggested is a bullet which shatters glass and issues a spray seen in the sunlight. The secret service man is below the dash or beside this glass shatter. Certainly tracing his head movement, he looks like he was in the motion of ducking in the previous frames. The "projectile" appears to be low and doesn't strike Kennedy in the face as the face continues to be white and uninjured, although the arm drops down and becomes lifeless.
6) At
Z329, a mere 1/2 a second later than this, you see a head shot that you just can't miss. A huge explosion in the windshield and large shatter in the light and a very large "red fireball" / blur at a position where the President's "white face and head" were in the frames just prior.
7) Zapruder was very close and it may have just shocked him and he shook his camera and that is why it became blurred at that instant.
Look closely at
Z335 and you can see Jacqueline's eyes grow as big as saucers. We still don't see any evidence of anything in her face or eyes which suggests that it was a frontal shot with the debris field behind the vehicle, not the front. Closely examining this photograph and zooming in on JFK's head it appears that they clearly "wiped off" the front of his head and replaced it with her dress with some blending.
9) Anyone that looks at that frame and can't see that it was doctored is really naive and doesn't want to know the truth when it is starring them right in the face! It is an abrupt interface. There is a distinct line between face and no face!
10) Note also that the white marker in the grass lines up very nicely with
Z322 and
Z329 - just a coincidence of course that someone left that in the grass for the driver to look at for cue-ing!
11) Blow this evidence of as farcical and you might as well continue to be a LNer. It might help to laugh a bit at how inconceivable this cockamamie explanation is! More than one shooter - absolutely! Have a lone gunman bear it alone - absolutely! He was just simply an expert marine marksman and a nut case to boot!
