You think my hypothesis is "stupid" when your crazy narrative has the authorities successfully suppressing curtain rods to avoid having them ever associated with Oswald but then five months later voluntarily bringing them to light to test them for - wait for it - Oswald's prints!
What is it with you and strawman arguments, Mr Smith? I never said what you say I said!
Now listen up, I'm going to play nice here and talk you through this incredibly complex matter one more time!
The Crime Scene Search Section form tells us that
-------------as of 7.30pm 23 March 1964--------------
there were 2 curtain rods in Lieutenant Day's crime lab.
Get your calculator out, Mr Smith, and press '2'! We know from the on-the-record testimony of Ms Paine in Irving, Texas on 23 March 1964 that
-------------as of 7.30pm 23 March 1964--------------
there were 2 curtain rods in the Paine garage.
Press '+ 2' on your calculator, Mr Smith! Well done, sir, you're doing an outstanding job!
Now press '='! What number has just popped up on your calculator screen, Mr Smith?Did I create the hard evidence yielding this number? Nope! I'm just reporting it. It's there for all to see on the official Crime Scene Search Section form.
So there's no point attacking me. All
that does is draw renewed attention to your
utter, total, embarrassing inability to explain the hard evidence away!