Was Lee Oswald the passenger in Whaley's Taxi?

[John Iacoletti]

Oh No, that's not true.....But when facts are presented ( like the 85 cent fare) that is Not a fabrication... whereas the official tale that Lee Oswald was Whaley's passenger IS a fabrication....

There's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he paid an 85 cent fare to anybody.  Just like there's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he changed his shirt.  You're free to speculate and assume, but don't go calling them facts.  You're doing just what the LNers do.

I have no trouble with the postulation that Whaley's passenger was somebody else -- his story is full of inconsistencies.  That doesn't entitle you to make stuff up to support it.

[Walt Cakebread]

There's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he paid an 85 cent fare to anybody.  Just like there's no evidence beyond Oswald's say so that he changed his shirt.  You're free to speculate and assume, but don't go calling them facts.  You're doing just what the LNers do.

I have no trouble with the postulation that Whaley's passenger was somebody else -- his story is full of inconsistencies.  That doesn't entitle you to make stuff up to support it.

Let me get this straight..... You accept the nonsense handed to you by the authorities and do not call them fabrications ...even though an intelligent and reasoning person can clearly see that they are fabrications.....

But if someone exposes their lie by producing plausible evidence that they were lying like the 85 cent taxi fare then that person id "making stuff up"....   Do I have this right? 

[John Iacoletti]

But if someone exposes their lie by producing plausible evidence that they were lying like the 85 cent taxi fare then that person id "making stuff up"....   Do I have this right?

No, not even close.  What you call "plausible evidence" is just stuff that you completely invent out of whole cloth because you think it's "reasonable".  Like the whole Brennan west window thing.

[Walt Cakebread]

No, not even close.  What you call "plausible evidence" is just stuff that you completely invent out of whole cloth because you think it's "reasonable".  Like the whole Brennan west window thing.

So you accept the fabricated tale that was created by LBJ's Special Blue Ribbon Committee that was based on William Whaley's obvious Bull Stuff.....   While rejecting  the statement of Lee Oswald that he paid a taxi driver 85 cents to transport him to the rooming house even though Lee would have had no reason to invent the taxi ride.

[John Iacoletti]

So you accept the fabricated tale that was created by LBJ's Special Blue Ribbon Committee that was based on William Whaley's obvious Bull Stuff.....   While rejecting  the statement of Lee Oswald that he paid a taxi driver 85 cents to transport him to the rooming house even though Lee would have had no reason to invent the taxi ride.

Who said I accept the WC version?  That doesn't automatically mean that your fabricated tales win.  Do you have some evidence that Oswald paid anyone 85 cents for a taxi ride?  Who was this cab driver (and don't say Darrel Click)?  Where is his log sheet?

[Walt Cakebread]

Who said I accept the WC version?  That doesn't automatically mean that your fabricated tales win.  Do you have some evidence that Oswald paid anyone 85 cents for a taxi ride?  Who was this cab driver (and don't say Darrel Click)?  Where is his log sheet?

Who was this cab driver (and don't say Darrel Click)?  Where is his log sheet?

Are you really this naive and obtuse?

The authorities were not interested in verifying anything Lee Oswald told them.....  In their warped and biased minds he was a cop killer and  they only wanted evidence that supported their accusations.....even if they had to fabricate that evidence.

[John Iacoletti]

Who was this cab driver (and don't say Darrel Click)?  Where is his log sheet?

Are you really this naive and obtuse?

The authorities were not interested in verifying anything Lee Oswald told them.....  In their warped and biased minds he was a cop killer and  they only wanted evidence that supported their accusations.....even if they had to fabricate that evidence.

So no evidence then.  And anyone should believe your evidence-less made up story because...?

[Walt Cakebread]

So no evidence then.  And anyone should believe your evidence-less made up story because...?

Because the official tale is utter BS.......  You can see that...Can't you?