A straight line

[John Iacoletti]

The only prints given to Darby by McClellan and Harrison were left, little finger prints of Wallace. And they were not found in the TSBD. It was all a sham.

What is your evidence for this?

[Wesley Johnson]

Martin, I was just responding to John.

So what? This is a public forum.

John's statement about the DPD was pointless.

It wasn't a statement. It was a question and it certainly wasn't pointless since you had told me to search the DPD files for something you knew wasn't there.

What do you have to do with anything John posts to me? My post to him had nothing to do with me telling you to do anything. You are getting kind of weird Martin.

[Martin Weidmann]

What do you have to do with anything John posts to me? My post to him had nothing to do with me telling you to do anything. You are getting kind of weird Martin.

My post to him had nothing to do with me telling you to do anything.

I seriously doubt that you actually know or remember what you have written on this forum...

You seem to be truly confused.

[John Iacoletti]

What do you have to do with anything John posts to me? My post to him had nothing to do with me telling you to do anything. You are getting kind of weird Martin.

Try to follow along, Wesley:

Tim, McClellan and Harrison gave Darby an old fingerprint of Wallace's along with an old fingerprint card with Wallace's print on it. They never gave Darby the real latent palm print from the TSBD 6th floor. It was all a fake.

And the evidence for this is.... what exactly?

From the Dallas Police Department Martin. Look it up. I did.

[Wesley Johnson]

What is your evidence for this?

Are you saying that you don't believe McClellan and Harrison gave Darby two finger prints to analyze? And that he said they matched and McClellan and Harrison came out and said they were Mac Wallace's left, little finger prints? Lol.

"only one latent palm print remains to be identified" (CE 3131, 26H 799, 809)

[Wesley Johnson]

My post to him had nothing to do with me telling you to do anything.

I seriously doubt that you actually know or remember what you have written on this forum...

You seem to be truly confused.

"One palmprint on Box B was unidentified." "only one latent palm print remains to be identified" (CE 3131, 26H 799, 809)

What Martin? "I seriously doubt that you actually know or remember what you have written on this forum..."
 
That's all you have to say? You are always asking me to cite something that most on here are already aware of. You disappoint me Martin. And here I was thinking we could be friends.

[Martin Weidmann]

"One palmprint on Box B was unidentified." "only one latent palm print remains to be identified" (CE 3131, 26H 799, 809)

What Martin? "I seriously doubt that you actually know or remember what you have written on this forum..."
 

That's all you have to say? You are always asking me to cite something that most on here are already aware of. You disappoint me Martin. And here I was thinking we could be friends.

And here I was thinking we could be friends.

You came here to make friends?

You become more Myttonesque by the day.

[John Iacoletti]

Are you saying that you don't believe McClellan and Harrison gave Darby two finger prints to analyze?

Sigh......

I'm asking you for evidence for your claim that "the only prints given to Darby by McClellan and Harrison were left, little finger prints of Wallace".  Do you have any?

"only one latent palm print remains to be identified" (CE 3131, 26H 799, 809)

Are you sure about that?  This seems to indicate that there was an unidentified fingerprint (print #20) on Box B.