A straight line

[Wesley Johnson]

And here I was thinking we could be friends.

You came here to make friends?

You become more Myttonesque by the day.

You came here to make friends?

You need to get out more Martin. It was only lighthearted sarcasm. Lighten up. Go have a beer and loosen up. 

[Martin Weidmann]

You came here to make friends?

You need to get out more Martin. It was only lighthearted sarcasm. Lighten up. Go have a beer and loosen up. 

So much to you understanding sarcasm..

[Wesley Johnson]

So much to you understanding sarcasm..

Oh, I get it Martin. But you don't. If we ever happen to meet at Dealy Plaza, I'll buy you that beer.

[John Iacoletti]

This seems to indicate that there was an unidentified fingerprint (print #20) on Box B.

Sigh.
It doesn't indicate that at all John and you know it. It does not say "unidentified" at all. It says "all but one of the fingerprints on Box B belonged to Studebaker and Lucy and one palmprint was that of Studebaker".
You are stretching it a bit there John.

Stretching it?  Did you see the photograph of print #20 from box B with "unidentified" written on the back of it?

[John Iacoletti]

John, it is not a matter of me having any evidence for that. I'm only going by what McClellan and Harrison claimed themselves. Are you saying that the two prints that Darby was given were not Wallace's? In 1998 Darby was approached by McClellan and Harrison and given two prints. One was from a 1951 fingerprint exemplar card and the other was "supposedly" a latent print from a cardboard box found on the 6th floor of the TSBD at the sniper's nest.

Why do you say "supposedly"?  I have just shown that there were at least 2 fingerprints that apparently were not identified by Latona.

In Darby's March 9, 1998 affidavit Darby said they were "the left little finger". If you have a problem with that go talk to Darby.

I'm not talking about what Darby said -- I'm talking about what you said:

"the only prints given to Darby by McClellan and Harrison were left, little finger prints of Wallace"

Darby's affidavit doesn't say that at all.  He says that he received a photocopy of an inked print along with a photocopy of a latent print.  It was you who declared that they duped him by giving him two left, little finger prints of Wallace.  What is your evidence for this?

[Wesley Johnson]

Stretching it?  Did you see the photograph of print #20 from box B with "unidentified" written on the back of it?

Did you see the photograph of print #20 from box B with "unidentified" written on the back of it?
[/quote]

Do you have any evidence to prove that the photo wasn't faked and that the fingerprint was not later identified? What is your evidence that that is really print #20? Do you have any evidence that, that is really box 20? 

[Martin Weidmann]

Did you see the photograph of print #20 from box B with "unidentified" written on the back of it?


Do you have any evidence to prove that the photo wasn't faked and that the fingerprint was not later identified? What is your evidence that that is really print #20? Do you have any evidence that, that is really box 20? 

A LN who thinks he's clever by questioning the evidence of the WC... Now I've seen it all.

And all because Wesley can't give a straight answer if it saved his life.....

[Wesley Johnson]

Why do you say "supposedly"?  I have just shown that there were at least 2 fingerprints that apparently were not identified by Latona.

I'm not talking about what Darby said -- I'm talking about what you said:

"the only prints given to Darby by McClellan and Harrison were left, little finger prints of Wallace"

Darby's affidavit doesn't say that at all.  He says that he received a photocopy of an inked print along with a photocopy of a latent print.  It was you who declared that they duped him by giving him two left, little finger prints of Wallace.  What is your evidence for this?

I have just shown that there were at least 2 fingerprints that apparently were not identified by Latona.

How do I know that you just showed that there were at least 2 fingerprints that were apparently not identified by latona? Do you have any evidence of that? Are you saying the prints matched by Darby were not of Wallace's left little finger?