A straight line

[John Iacoletti]

No, I don't. Tell me how difficult it would be.  Or to a PO Box registered under "AJ HIDELL".

What gave you the idea that there was a PO box registered under AJ HIDELL?

[Tim Nickerson]

Damned near impossible. And at the very least, Oswald must have taken the time AFTER the shooting to wipe his prints off the stock, bolt and trigger, before ditching the weapon. You give LHO way too much credit. No one could have done this, let alone patsy Oswald.

You state that as if you know it from experience.  Are you a forensic crime analyst as well? That's quite a resume you've got there.

[Andrew Mason]

What gave you the idea that there was a PO box registered under AJ HIDELL?

I am assuming or inferring that. The actual registration documents for that box were destroyed.. A Hidell was likely registered to receive mail at that box because mail addressed to that name was received at that box. When Oswald moved to New Orleans he registered A. Hidell as a person entitled to receive mail there.

[Bill Chapman]

It sure is easy to make an argument when you just assume that the thing you're trying to prove is true.

Iacoletti = 787 posts in less than two months.

Pretty damn busy, John

[Bill Chapman]

Sigh.  No, Bill.  It's a lame excuse because it's completely contrived with no evidence whatsoever that Oswald wanted to "look like a sniper" while shooting the president.  If that was the case, and he had actually done it, why would he deny doing it?

You mean the same Marina who said there was no scope on this rifle at the time?

Oswald denied everything
Marina wasn't in the sniper nest at the time

[Jack Trojan]

You state that as if you know it from experience.  Are you a forensic crime analyst as well? That's quite a resume you've got there.

Spank you very much. But you don't have to be an expert to use some common sense, logic and maybe a little research. You should try it sometime.

[Bill Chapman]

It sure is easy to make an argument when you just assume that the thing you're trying to prove is true.

Show us where I claim the BY scene is proof of murder
Show us where I have claimed that any single factor on its own is proof of murder

My earlier post:
"However, brandishing a rifle, with pistol on his hip, decked out in all-black getup, clutching commie literature* and posing for the camera might suggest that which you dismiss so easily may be not so far off the mark after all"

Show us where I have ever claimed that I could prove Oswald was the killer

[Bill Chapman]

The fact that you called it a 'lame excuse' suggests you must know Oswald would not want to 'look like a sniper'

No.

Try to follow along, please, if you can...

The person making the claim could not possibly know what Oswald was thinking, so any claim based on that alone would automatically be a lame excuse.

Get it now?

Are you sure the original poster claimed that he knew what Oswald was thinking?
Are you suggesting that I claimed to know what Oswald was thinking?
Are you sure that I require your help in this matter?

A person can study Oswald's backstory including the BY scene, the 'killer of facsists' note, George DeM joking around about the Walker attempt, Oswald often calling himself important (according to Marina, and which she also found funny).

I contend that adding the scope to the mix could arguably align with Oswald's known arrogant behaviour.